The ProblemThe Gap Between Intelligence
The Gap Between Intelligence
and Action.
Manual triage. Siloed tools. Playbooks that break mid-incident. Your stack wasn't built for the speed adversaries move at.
Too Manual
Security Operations Are Still Too Manual
Morning CVE triage. Copy-paste between tools. Manual ticket creation. Asset owner hunting. Your analysts spend 80% of their time on repetitive operational work and 20% on the strategic thinking you hired them for. That ratio should be inverted.
- Hours lost to copy-paste workflows
- Analysts buried in triage, not analysis
- Every handoff is a delay and an error
Siloed Datasets
Your Data Lives in Too Many Places
Vulnerabilities in one tool. Threat intel in another. Assets in a spreadsheet. Third-party risk in a questionnaire. No single system connects a zero-day to the actors exploiting it, the assets you have exposed, and the vendors who share that exposure. Your team is the integration layer, and that doesn't scale.
- Intel fragmented across dozens of tools
- No single source of truth for risk
- Teams making decisions with partial data
Not Fast Enough
By the Time You Act, It's Too Late
Adversaries weaponize CVEs within hours of disclosure. Your current workflow takes days: wait for the scan, wait for the report, wait for the meeting, wait for the ticket. By the time intelligence reaches the right person in the right format, the window to act has already closed.
- Days from disclosure to remediation
- Intel that arrives after the damage is done
- Speed of attack outpaces speed of response
Brittle Automation
Your Automation Breaks When It Matters Most
SOAR playbooks look great in a demo. In production, they break the moment inputs change. If/then logic can't handle the complexity of real-world security operations. One unexpected field, one renamed asset, one new data source, and the whole workflow stalls. You need automation that reasons, not automation that follows a script.
- Playbooks that break on edge cases
- If/then logic that can't adapt
- Automation that creates more work to maintain
Solutions by Role
Different Roles. Same Problem: Not Enough Time.
CTI leads drowning in feeds. SOC teams buried in repetitive tasks. Detection engineers manually extracting TTPs. Mallory gives time back to each role.
CTI Analysts
Threats Move Fast. Manual Monitoring Can’t Keep Up.
A new threat surfaces. The scramble to check if you’re affected takes hours. Source fidelity is ignored. Claims are treated the same as confirmations. Mallory delivers early warning with confidence scoring you can trust.
- Always-on monitoring across thousands of sources
- Source confidence scoring: claims vs confirmations
- Automated enrichment and correlation across sources
- Instant answers to ‘are we protected?’ questions
Try Asking Mallory
>Am I affected by CVE-2024-3400?
>What threat actors are targeting the financial sector this month?
>Show vulnerabilities disclosed in the last 24 hours with active exploits
>What’s the source confidence for this dark web claim?
Why Teams Switch
Sound Familiar?
These are the triggers that bring security teams to Mallory, validated by conversations with CTI leads, SOC managers, and CISOs.
“I spend 80% on manual tasks, 20% on analysis. It should be flipped.”
CTI teams drowning in tactical work
“A React vuln took us a full week to remediate.”
Vulnerability response taking too long
“Who owns this vulnerable system? Nobody knows.”
Can’t find asset owners
“We produce great reports. Nobody reads them.”
Intel doesn’t become action