Loading story…
Policy and defense stakeholders are continuing to formalize national-level cybersecurity strategy as an organizing framework that coordinates responsibilities across government, regulators, law enforcement, and the private operators that run most critical infrastructure. Reported guidance highlights a shift toward whole-of-society models that connect cyber risk management, workforce planning, technology standards, and cross-sector coordination (e.g., health care, energy, transportation, finance, and education), with risk assessments increasingly accounting for supply chain exposure, aging systems, workforce gaps, and the impact of AI and emerging technologies on both defense and attacker tradecraft.
In parallel, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) published Zero Trust Implementation Guidelines (ZIG) intended to help organizations progress toward target-level zero trust maturity in alignment with broader government cybersecurity strategy. The guidance uses a modular, phased approach—Phase One defining 36 activities mapped to 30 capabilities to establish a baseline, and Phase Two adding 41 activities tied to 34 additional capabilities—while emphasizing continuous authentication/authorization and visibility into application policy decision points to address attacks that occur post-authentication; the NSA also indicated additional advanced phases could be developed later.
Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.
1 event from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
The National Security Agency released new Zero Trust Implementation Guidelines developed with the Department of Defense CIO to help organizations advance toward target-level zero trust maturity. The guidance defines a modular phased approach, with Phase One and Phase Two covering 152 activities across zero trust capabilities and emphasizing continuous authentication and authorization after login.
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
The **NSA** published *Zero Trust Implementation Guidelines* **Phase One** and **Phase Two**, expanding its series beyond earlier *Primer* and *Discovery Phase* materials to provide more actionable, task-based direction aligned to the DoD target-level maturity model. Phase One outlines **36 activities** intended to establish conditions for **30 zero trust capabilities**, while Phase Two defines **41 activities** to begin integrating core zero trust solutions and enable **34 additional capabilities**, with a modular approach intended to let organizations tailor adoption based on maturity and constraints. Separately, the **General Services Administration (GSA)** is tightening federal supply-chain cybersecurity expectations by issuing an IT security procedural guide (CIO-IT Security-21-112 Rev. 1) that imposes **CMMC-like** requirements on certain **new contracts involving CUI**, including implementation of **NIST SP 800-171** and selected **800-172** controls. The guide identifies **eight blocking requirements** (including **MFA**, **encryption of CUI in transit and at rest**, **vulnerability scanning/remediation**, and removal of **end-of-life components**) and requires **independent assessments** via FedRAMP third-party organizations or GSA-approved assessors, though GSA has not published assessor approval criteria—creating potential uncertainty for contractors; a separate GSA acquisition discussion on AI purchasing emphasizes flexibility, cost savings, and responsible use but does not materially add to the zero trust or contractor-control policy details.
Jun 29, 2026
U.S. cybersecurity experts and industry leaders are urging a comprehensive overhaul of national cybersecurity strategy, emphasizing the need to prioritize critical infrastructure, adopt memory-safe programming languages, and implement formal methods to reduce vulnerabilities. Recommendations include focusing on systems whose compromise could have catastrophic impacts, such as the electrical grid and water systems, and accelerating the transition to safer software development practices. The federal government has begun outlining roadmaps for these changes, but experts argue that more decisive action is needed to address the persistent and evolving threat landscape. Industry voices also highlight the importance of shifting from traditional perimeter-based defenses to a risk management and resilience-focused approach. Security leaders advocate for embedding zero trust principles, leveraging graph-based analysis to understand attacker movement, and fostering collaboration across organizations. The consensus is that while technical solutions are critical, a strategic, holistic, and adaptive mindset is essential for defending against sophisticated cyber adversaries targeting both public and private sector assets.
Jun 29, 2026
The Trump administration is preparing to release a new national cybersecurity strategy, with a focus on strengthening partnerships with U.S. industry and regional foreign governments to protect critical infrastructure and networks from cyberthreats. The strategy emphasizes real-time threat detection, attribution, and response capabilities, as well as deregulation to boost competitiveness and innovation in the American technology sector. The broader national security strategy, recently published, highlights the importance of collaboration with the private sector and regional partners, particularly in the Western Hemisphere, and outlines goals for resilient energy infrastructure and secure cyber communications. A draft of the forthcoming national cybersecurity strategy is expected to be released in January and will consist of six pillars: cyber offense and deterrence, regulatory alignment, workforce development, federal procurement, critical infrastructure protection, and emerging technologies. The document is described as concise but wide-ranging, addressing issues such as cybercrime, China, artificial intelligence, and post-quantum cryptography. The administration is actively seeking feedback on the draft, and the strategy is expected to be followed by an executive order to implement its provisions.
Jun 29, 2026