Skip to main content
Mallory
10 malware familiesExploits CVEs in the wild

Stealth Falcon

Also known asDaffodil GustFruity Armorfruityarmorg0038Project RavenStealth Falcon

Stealth Falcon, also tracked here as daffodil_gust and also known as FruityArmor, Fruity Armor, G0038, and Project Raven, is a likely state-sponsored cyberespionage threat actor aligned with UAE interests. Reporting in the provided content describes the group as active since at least 2012 and focused on governments, government-adjacent entities, defense organizations, and dissidents, primarily in the Middle East and surrounding region, including targeting in the UAE, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, and Yemen. Citizen Lab described Stealth Falcon as a sophisticated and likely state-sponsored group targeting Emirati journalists, activists, and dissidents, with circumstantial evidence aligning its interests with UAE Security Forces. The group has used targeted spyware and spear-phishing operations involving fake Twitter personas, spoofed emails, phony websites, malicious shortened URLs, and macro-enabled documents. In one documented chain, a macro passed a Base64-encoded PowerShell command that gathered system information through WMI and queried the Windows Registry to determine the installed .NET version. Stealth Falcon malware is described as gathering running processes, local system data, and detailed host information via WMI, including system directory, build number, serial number, version, manufacturer, model, and total physical memory. The malware also used PowerShell and WMI for scripted data collection and command execution, communicated with command-and-control over HTTPS, exfiltrated collected data over the existing C2 channel, and established persistence via a scheduled task named "IE Web Cache" executed hourly. Credential theft capabilities described in the content include collection of passwords from Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, Windows Credential Vault, Outlook, and other local sources. The content also describes a 2025 Stealth Falcon campaign against a major Turkish defense company exploiting CVE-2025-33053, a Windows WebDAV zero-day. That operation used a malicious .url file, abused working-directory behavior in legitimate Windows tools to load files from an attacker-controlled WebDAV server, and culminated in deployment of Horus Agent, a custom Mythic implant. Horus Agent is described as an evolution of the group’s customized Apollo implant and uses code virtualization, string encryption, and API hashing for evasion. Additional Stealth Falcon tooling identified in the content includes a domain controller credential dumper that accesses virtual disk copies to bypass file locks, a passive backdoor that listens for shellcode execution requests, and an RC4-encrypted keylogger. The group is also noted for using repurposed legitimate domains, often .net or .com domains purchased through NameCheap, as part of its infrastructure. The provided content further notes that Citizen Lab first encountered NSO infrastructure while investigating Stealth Falcon, and that Pegasus infrastructure overlapped with infrastructure previously fingerprinted as part of Stealth Falcon activity. However, the content distinguishes NSO Group and Pegasus from Stealth Falcon rather than treating them as aliases.

Share:
Are they targeting you?

Know when an actor pivots toward your sector

Mallory correlates actor tradecraft and target patterns against your stack, your sector, and your geography. See overlap before they land.

MITRE ATT&CK

Tradecraft

51 distinct techniques observed across reporting, grouped by tactic. Hover any cell for the evidence excerpt; click through for MITRE's full description.

13 of 15 tactics75 techniques×N= number of intelligence reports citing this technique
MITRE ATT&CK
TA0043
Reconnaissance
2 techniques
T1589
Gather Victim Identity Information
T1590
Gather Victim Network Information
TA0042
Resource Development
4 techniques
T1583
Acquire Infrastructure
T1583.001
Domains
T1584
Compromise Infrastructure
T1584.008
Network Devices
T1585
Establish Accounts
T1608
Stage Capabilities
TA0001
Initial Access
5 techniques
T1133
External Remote Services
T1189×2
Drive-by Compromise
T1190×2
Exploit Public-Facing Application
T1200
Hardware Additions
T1566×2
Phishing
T1566.001×2
Spearphishing Attachment
T1566.002×5
Spearphishing Link
T1566.003×2
Spearphishing via Service
TA0002
Execution
7 techniques
T1047×3
Windows Management Instrumentation
T1053
Scheduled Task/Job
T1053.005×3
Scheduled Task
T1059×5
Command and Scripting Interpreter
T1059.001×7
PowerShell
T1059.005
Visual Basic
T1059.007
JavaScript
T1129×3
Shared Modules
T1203×5
Exploitation for Client Execution
T1204
User Execution
T1204.002
Malicious File
T1574
Hijack Execution Flow
TA0003
Persistence
2 techniques
T1053
Scheduled Task/Job
T1053.005×3
Scheduled Task
T1133
External Remote Services
TA0004
Privilege Escalation
4 techniques
T1053
Scheduled Task/Job
T1053.005×3
Scheduled Task
T1055
Process Injection
T1055.012
Process Hollowing
T1068
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
T1484
Domain or Tenant Policy Modification
T1484.001
Group Policy Modification
TA0005
Stealth
5 techniques
T1027×2
Obfuscated Files or Information
T1027.007
Dynamic API Resolution
T1036×3
Masquerading
T1055
Process Injection
T1055.012
Process Hollowing
T1497
Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion
T1497.001
System Checks
T1574
Hijack Execution Flow
TA0112
Defense Impairment
1 technique
T1484
Domain or Tenant Policy Modification
T1484.001
Group Policy Modification
TA0006
Credential Access
5 techniques
T1003
OS Credential Dumping
T1056
Input Capture
T1056.001
Keylogging
T1555×2
Credentials from Password Stores
T1555.004
Windows Credential Manager
T1555.005
Password Managers
T1557×2
Adversary-in-the-Middle
T1649×2
Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates
TA0007
Discovery
7 techniques
T1012×3
Query Registry
T1016×2
System Network Configuration Discovery
T1033
System Owner/User Discovery
T1057
Process Discovery
T1082×5
System Information Discovery
T1497
Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion
T1497.001
System Checks
T1518×2
Software Discovery
TA0009
Collection
4 techniques
T1005×3
Data from Local System
T1056
Input Capture
T1056.001
Keylogging
T1185
Browser Session Hijacking
T1557×2
Adversary-in-the-Middle
TA0011
Command and Control
2 techniques
T1071×2
Application Layer Protocol
T1071.001×2
Web Protocols
T1090
Proxy
T1090.003
Multi-hop Proxy
TA0010
Exfiltration
2 techniques
T1041×3
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
T1048
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol
WEAPONIZED

Associated vulnerabilities

4 CVEs this actor has used in observed campaigns. 4 of them exploited in the wild.

CVE-2025-33053WebDAV / Internet Shortcut Files Remote Code Execution in Microsoft WindowsIn the wildEvidence7

The attack leveraged CVE-2025-33053, a remote code execution vulnerability that allows threat actors to manipulate the working directory of legitimate Windows tools to execute malicious files from attacker-controlled WebDAV servers. Microsoft released a security patch for this vulnerability as part of its June Patch Tuesday updates, following a responsible disclosure by Check Point Research.

CVE-2025-21042Samsung libimagecodec.quram.so Out-of-Bounds Write RCEIn the wildEvidence3

"Tracked as CVE-2025-21042, the flaw let hackers embed malware into a DNG image file, possibly texted to the victim through WhatsApp. It appears that device infections didn't require user interaction... constituting what's known as a zero-click attack."

CVE-2025-9491Microsoft Windows LNK File UI Misrepresentation Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityIn the wildEvidence2

This detection identifies instances where Windows Explorer.exe spawns PowerShell or cmd.exe processes, particularly focusing on executions initiated by LNK files. This behavior is associated with the ZDI-CAN-25373 Windows shortcut zero-day vulnerability, where specially crafted LNK files are used to trigger malicious code execution through cmd.exe or powershell.exe. This technique has been actively exploited by multiple APT groups in targeted attacks through both HTTP and SMB delivery methods.

CVE-2016-3393Windows Graphics Component RCE VulnerabilityIn the wildEvidence1

...we discovered a Windows zero-day, CVE-2016-3393, being used by a threat actor known as FruityArmor to mount targeted attacks.

IOCS

Observables

42 indicators attributed to this actor: domains, IPs, hashes, and other artifacts pulled from reporting. View more in app.

IOC values are gated. View more in Mallory for domains, IPs, hashes, and other artifacts, or pipe them straight into your SIEM.

What this page doesn’t show

The version that knows your environment.

This page is what’s public. Mallory adds the parts that aren’t: sector and geo overlap with your footprint, the IOCs they’re burning right now, detection coverage, and what to do next.
Target overlap

Match sector + geo + tech-stack targeting against your real footprint.

Tradecraft mapping51

Every observed MITRE ATT&CK technique, grouped by tactic.

Malware arsenal10

Families this actor is known to deploy, with IOCs and behavior.

Exploited CVEs4

CVEs this actor has used in known campaigns.

Detection signatures

YARA, Sigma, Snort, and vendor rules, auto-deployed to your SIEM.

Observables42

Domains, IPs, and hashes tied to this actor, refreshed continuously.