Loading story…
Meta and Google have postponed critical segments of their major subsea cable projects—Meta’s 2Africa and Google’s Blue-Raman—due to escalating security risks in the Red Sea region. Construction teams have faced repeated missile attacks from Houthi militants, as well as regulatory and operational challenges, forcing work stoppages and rerouting of planned cable segments. The 2Africa system, intended to encircle Africa and connect it with Europe and Asia, and the Blue-Raman route, designed to link Europe and India while bypassing Egypt, both remain incomplete in the Red Sea corridor.
The Red Sea is a vital internet bottleneck, carrying about 20% of global internet traffic, and recent incidents—including the severing of IMEWE and SEA-ME-WE 4 cables near Jeddah—have already caused significant disruptions and increased latency. The ongoing delays not only threaten to prolong these vulnerabilities but also increase operating costs for Meta and Google, who must purchase alternative capacity to meet demand. The situation has led to higher insurance premiums and a reduction in available vessel operators, further complicating efforts to complete these strategic infrastructure projects.
See attribution, scope, and your downstream exposure.
3 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Security risks in the Red Sea, including threats to ships and crews, caused delays to Meta's 2Africa and Google's Blue-Raman cable plans. The disruption affected projects intended to use a corridor that carries roughly a fifth of global internet traffic.
Google unveiled the Blue-Raman subsea cable project to connect Europe, the Middle East, and India, with routing that depended in part on the Red Sea region. The project became one of the major planned systems later delayed by instability in the area.
Meta and its consortium partners initiated the 2Africa undersea cable project to expand connectivity around Africa and through key international routes, including planned segments linked to the Red Sea corridor. This established one of the major cable systems later affected by regional security concerns.
See attribution, scope, and whether this vendor sits anywhere in your supply chain.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
securityonline.info
Open sourcetomshardware.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Recent disruptions to undersea cables in the Red Sea, impacting internet connectivity across Asia and the Middle East, are now believed to have been caused by a ship's anchor rather than sabotage. The incident severed multiple major cables, including SEA-ME-WE-4, IMEWE, FALCON GCX, and Europe India Gateway, leading to significant slowdowns and rerouting of traffic. Repairs are expected to take weeks, with no evidence of hostile intent identified so far.
Jun 29, 2026
Iran-linked threats and attacks expanded from shipping lanes to digital infrastructure across the Gulf, with reports naming **Google, Amazon, Oracle, IBM, and Nvidia** facilities in the Middle East as potential targets and describing earlier drone strikes that disrupted **AWS** operations in the UAE and Bahrain. Regional authorities later denied an IRGC claim that Oracle’s Dubai data center had been hit, but multiple reports said missile and drone attacks had already affected energy, desalination, and industrial sites in Kuwait and the UAE while raising fears for data centers and telecom assets tied to U.S. firms. The conflict’s cyber dimension also spilled into enterprise systems, with analysts warning that retaliation was increasingly aimed at civilian-adjacent technology, logistics, finance, and cloud dependencies rather than a single decisive cyberattack. At the same time, the Strait of Hormuz became a pressure point for both maritime traffic and internet connectivity. Large-scale **GPS/GNSS spoofing**, AIS suppression, dark vessel activity, and selective transit controls disrupted hundreds of ships, while repair and construction work on subsea cables slowed or stopped as security conditions deteriorated. Meta’s **2Africa/Africa2** cable project was delayed after Alcatel Submarine Networks declared force majeure, and Iran-linked media proposed licensing, taxing, and controlling undersea cable operations in the strait, with some outlets openly discussing cable disruption as leverage. Analysts warned that at least six major fiber systems crossing Hormuz underpin Gulf cloud services, finance, and trade, meaning prolonged interference or damage could delay repairs, force traffic onto riskier overland alternatives, and threaten the region’s broader digital-economy ambitions.
Jun 29, 2026
Submarine cables form the backbone of global internet connectivity, carrying the vast majority of international data and financial transactions. Recent reports have highlighted growing concerns over the security and resilience of these undersea cable networks, particularly in the face of geopolitical tensions, supply chain vulnerabilities, and slow repair processes. The Center for Cybersecurity Policy and Law has emphasized the need for increased redundancy in cable routes to prevent single points of failure, but high costs and complex permitting processes often hinder the deployment of new cables. In some jurisdictions, it can take over three years to approve a new cable landing site, discouraging private investment and leading to clusters of cables in the same locations, which increases risk. The report recommends that governments streamline permitting and coordinate with neighboring countries to align regulatory requirements, as well as encourage early engagement between regulators and cable operators to avoid costly project delays. Even with redundancy, cable failures are inevitable, and the speed of repairs is critical to maintaining global connectivity. Repair operations are often delayed by cabotage rules, port entry requirements, and customs fees, which can add days or weeks to the process. Proposals such as creating 'free ports' for repair materials and simplifying regulatory hurdles could significantly reduce downtime and costs. In the UK, the Parliament's Joint Committee on National Security Strategy has criticized the government for being 'too timid' in its approach to protecting the nation's 64 undersea cables, which handle £220 billion in daily financial transactions. The committee's report warns of abundant security vulnerabilities, noting that even accidental anchor drags can cause major disruptions. While the UK has some redundancy in its cable infrastructure, with 75 percent of transatlantic traffic routed through two main cables, this concentration also represents a significant vulnerability. The report acknowledges that accidental damage from fishing and shipping is common, with around 200 cable faults occurring annually worldwide. Although cables are heavily shielded in shallow waters, they rely on ocean depth for protection further out, and the risk of deliberate sabotage is increasing amid rising geopolitical tensions. The importance of these cables to national economies and global communications cannot be overstated, yet their protection remains a complex challenge due to the international nature of the infrastructure and the need for cooperation between governments and private industry. Both reports stress the urgency of improving regulatory frameworks, investing in redundancy, and streamlining repair operations to ensure the continued resilience of the global submarine cable network. The growing awareness of these vulnerabilities has prompted calls for more decisive government action and greater collaboration across borders. As digital economies expand and reliance on undersea cables intensifies, the consequences of a major disruption could be severe, affecting everything from internet access to financial markets. The reports conclude that proactive measures are essential to safeguard this critical infrastructure against both accidental and intentional threats.
Jun 29, 2026