Loading story…
Chief Information Officers (CIOs) are increasingly focused on developing and executing AI strategies that deliver measurable business value, as recent research highlights widespread challenges in achieving returns on AI investments. Multiple reports, including those from MIT and Gartner, indicate that the majority of AI projects fail to scale, solve business problems, or generate expected returns, with some studies noting that up to 95% of organizations see no ROI from significant generative AI investments. However, organizations with mature AI practices report sustained benefits in efficiency, productivity, and market differentiation, emphasizing the importance of aligning AI initiatives with clear business outcomes, robust data operations, and organizational risk appetite.
Experts and successful CIOs agree that there is no universal formula for AI strategy success. Instead, they recommend a tailored approach that includes focusing on outcome-driven objectives, ensuring AI projects are directly tied to business goals, and continuously measuring value through key performance indicators. Additional best practices include fostering internal AI competencies, transforming data governance, and maintaining alignment between IT and business units. These insights underscore the need for CIOs to critically assess their AI strategies, prioritize high-value use cases, and adapt governance models to maximize the impact of AI across the enterprise.
Track how attackers are adapting to this technology.
4 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
KPMG survey data showed many enterprises were assessing AI returns using productivity, work quality, and decision-making speed rather than traditional financial ROI alone. The survey also found 65% planned to keep investing in AI even when tangible returns were difficult to measure, reflecting a long-term strategic view of adoption.
Experts advised CIOs to build AI programs around business outcomes, risk appetite, data readiness, governance, human oversight, and cross-functional coordination as agentic AI increases pressure to define how much autonomy to delegate to AI systems.
Recent findings cited from Gartner, EY, and Immuta showed that many organizations lacked clear AI objectives, mature data security strategies, and sufficient risk controls, while nearly a third reported attacks on AI infrastructure or applications in the past year.
MIT's 2025 State of AI in Business report found that 95% of organizations were seeing zero return on significant generative AI investments, highlighting widespread failure to realize measurable value from enterprise AI initiatives.
Follow how adversaries are adapting to this technology, and where it touches your stack today.
4 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
itpro.com
Open sourcecio.com
Open sourcecio.com
Open sourcecio.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
CIOs and technology leaders are responding to concerns about an AI market bubble by adopting more disciplined, risk-aware approaches to AI investments. Many are focusing on de-risking commitments, tightening governance, and favoring shorter contracts to maintain flexibility as the market evolves. Experts predict that the initial hype around AI will subside, with organizations shifting their attention to practical applications, governance, and measurable returns on investment. Companies are increasingly appointing heads of AI governance and emphasizing pilot projects that can demonstrate tangible business value before scaling up. In parallel, some enterprises are implementing structured programs to democratize AI expertise across their workforce, aiming to drive adoption while balancing innovation with data security. By leveraging both partner-provided and proprietary AI tools, organizations like Black & Veatch are embedding AI into core business functions such as engineering, safety, and resource management. This cohort-driven approach is designed to overcome human barriers to adoption, foster internal champions, and convert employee engagement into operational and competitive advantages.
Jun 29, 2026
Boards of directors are increasingly prioritizing cybersecurity, with a particular focus on how artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are transforming both risk and defense strategies. As AI systems evolve from predictive models to agentic systems capable of autonomous action, organizations are seeing significant improvements in threat identification and response times. Reports indicate that companies deploying agentic AI for security use cases experience substantial returns on investment, with notable gains in operational efficiency and risk reduction. This shift is prompting boards to formalize AI oversight, integrate data privacy and security into all deployments, and ensure that early successes with AI can be scaled across the enterprise. At the same time, the threat landscape is intensifying as cybercriminals weaponize AI to bypass traditional defenses, making responsible AI governance essential for building resilient security architectures. Experts emphasize that effective AI governance frameworks not only enhance an organization’s ability to predict and counter sophisticated attacks but also help align cybersecurity initiatives with broader business objectives. The dual role of AI—as both a tool for defenders and attackers—underscores the need for leadership, accountability, and robust governance to ensure that AI-driven security measures deliver measurable business value while mitigating emerging risks.
Jul 12, 2026
Organizations are reevaluating the structure and authority of CIO and CISO roles as artificial intelligence becomes integral to enterprise operations. The increasing adoption of AI and digital transformation initiatives is driving a need for clearer delineation of responsibilities, with CIOs focusing on rapid technology innovation and alignment with business priorities, while CISOs address expanding attack surfaces and new threat vectors introduced by AI tools. Regulatory pressures and the demand for operational resilience are prompting some experts to advocate for greater CISO authority and independence from CIO oversight to ensure effective risk management. The dynamic between CIOs and CISOs is further complicated by conflicting mandates and evolving corporate governance structures. As enterprises race to implement AI solutions, the collaboration between these two roles is seen as critical for balancing innovation with security. The conversation highlights the necessity for organizations to adapt their leadership models and skillsets to meet the challenges posed by AI-driven change and the unpredictable nature of emerging technologies.
Jun 29, 2026