Loading story…
Organizations are facing increasing challenges in managing cybersecurity risks due to fragmented vulnerability management tooling, rising backlogs, and the need for continuous incident response. A recent report highlights that most companies use multiple detection tools, leading to difficulties in visibility, correlation, and prioritization of vulnerabilities. While many organizations have formal workflows and SLAs for remediation, the mean time to remediate critical issues remains high, with automation and integration of threat intelligence being key differentiators for faster response. Assigning remediation to cybersecurity or SOC teams, rather than infrastructure groups, has also been shown to improve response times.
At the same time, the evolving threat landscape has made 24/7 incident response a necessity, as attackers leverage automation and global infrastructure to target organizations at all hours. Relying solely on compliance frameworks is insufficient for real-world protection, as these standards often fail to address gaps exploited by attackers. Effective security now requires continuous monitoring, real-time awareness, and practiced incident response capabilities, moving beyond compliance as a baseline to proactive risk management and operational resilience.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
3 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Help Net Security published coverage on vulnerability management trends, highlighting that fragmented tooling slows remediation efforts. No specific underlying incident, victim, or disclosure event is provided in the reference content.
SecuritySenses published a blog post stating that compliance frameworks alone do not secure networks and that organizations must add continuous monitoring, testing, and incident response. The reference describes general security analysis rather than a specific breach or vulnerability event.
SecuritySenses published a blog post arguing that around-the-clock incident response had become a business necessity in 2025. The reference provides no discrete incident or external event beyond the publication itself.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
3 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
helpnetsecurity.com
Open sourcesecuritysenses.com
Open sourcesecuritysenses.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Security leaders are increasingly recognizing that traditional approaches to cybersecurity training and incident response are insufficient in the face of rapidly evolving threats. According to the Cytactic 2025 State of Cyber Incident Response Management (CIRM) Report, 57% of significant cyber incidents involve attack scenarios that organizations have never rehearsed, highlighting a critical gap in preparedness. Many organizations focus their tabletop exercises on well-known threats such as ransomware, but the real challenge often comes from novel and unexpected attack vectors. Security experts argue that tabletop exercises are frequently either too specific or too grandiose, failing to address the nuanced and likely scenarios that teams are more apt to encounter. For example, some enterprises have gone to great lengths, such as purchasing burner phones for secure communications during exercises, only to discover practical issues during the simulation. Analysts and consultants point out that these exercises often lack realism and do not align with the actual risk and threat profiles of the organization. Meanwhile, a global survey by DarkTrace found that 74% of cybersecurity professionals view AI-powered threats as a major challenge, and 90% expect these threats to significantly impact their organizations within the next one to two years. The increasing use of AI-generated malware and autonomous reconnaissance by adversaries means that threats are evolving in real time, outpacing the static, compliance-driven training models many organizations still use. Legacy approaches, such as annual penetration tests and semi-annual tabletop exercises, are no longer adequate, as they provide limited visibility and fail to build lasting strategic capabilities. These outdated models also assume that adversaries are predictable, which is no longer the case in the current threat landscape. Experts advocate for a shift toward Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM), a discipline that emphasizes ongoing, threat-informed practice rather than occasional, fragmented exercises. This approach requires organizations to move from reactive defense to operational resilience, fostering cross-functional collaboration and daily engagement with emerging threats. By making training exercises more relevant, realistic, and tailored to the organization's specific context, security teams can better align with business objectives and improve their ability to respond to unforeseen incidents. The consensus among industry leaders is that a transformation in both mindset and practice is essential to keep pace with the dynamic nature of cyber threats. Organizations that fail to adapt risk being unprepared for the next wave of sophisticated attacks, particularly those leveraging artificial intelligence and automation. Ultimately, the future of cybersecurity training lies in continuous, adaptive, and business-aligned preparation that mirrors the complexity and speed of modern adversaries.
Jun 29, 2026
Organizations are increasingly challenged by the risks posed by legacy systems, unmanageable devices, and unknown assets within their networks. Security leaders and experts emphasize the importance of comprehensive asset discovery and visibility as foundational steps to effective vulnerability management. Automated solutions that map infrastructure, including unauthenticated and legacy devices, are critical for identifying blind spots and prioritizing risk. Experts caution against over-reliance on traditional CVE-based tools, highlighting that many real-world breaches exploit default credentials, poor configurations, and unmanaged assets that may not appear in standard vulnerability reports. Rapid response capabilities, such as real-time intelligence and query-based searches, are recommended to quickly identify and mitigate zero-day exposures. In sectors like healthcare, the long lifecycle of medical devices presents unique challenges, as many systems cannot be patched or easily replaced. Security leaders advocate for network segmentation and close collaboration with vendors to manage these risks, while also promoting proactive, risk-based approaches that go beyond compliance checklists. Commentary from industry professionals underscores that legacy and unmanageable systems are often targeted by advanced persistent threats and botnets, with attackers leveraging automation and AI to exploit exposures. Addressing these challenges requires breaking down silos between IT, OT, and security teams, and adopting strategies that prioritize visibility, risk reduction, and continuous improvement across all assets.
Jun 29, 2026
Organizations are facing a rapidly evolving threat landscape, with attackers increasingly leveraging stealthy techniques such as living-off-the-land, supply chain compromises, and edge device exploitation to bypass hardened traditional defenses. Security leaders are responding by adopting exposure-first strategies, improving telemetry, and focusing on proactive measures to reduce attack surfaces. The importance of understanding and managing what is visible to attackers, including third-party and supply chain exposures, is emphasized as a critical step in slowing adversaries and building resilience. Additionally, the shift toward edge computing, cloud adoption, and the proliferation of IoT devices are driving the need for unified, adaptive security frameworks that can protect data and operations across diverse environments. Security operations centers (SOCs) are being urged to improve the quality of their data inputs and adopt holistic, triathlon-like training approaches to enhance readiness, consistency, and endurance in defense. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) is recognized as necessary but insufficient on its own, with proactive exposure management and comprehensive edge-to-cloud strategies becoming essential. The integration of AI, the need for strong evidence retention, and the importance of collaboration across the industry are highlighted as key factors in staying ahead of threat actors. These trends underscore the necessity for organizations to rethink their security architectures and operational practices to address both current and emerging cyber risks effectively.
Jun 29, 2026