Loading story…
Major US semiconductor companies, including AMD, Intel, and Texas Instruments, are facing five lawsuits filed in Texas by Ukrainian civilians. The suits allege that these companies failed to adequately prevent their chips from being diverted to Russia, where they were subsequently found in drones and missiles used in attacks against Ukraine. Despite export controls and sanctions imposed after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the lawsuits claim that the companies exhibited willful ignorance or negligence by not implementing sufficient measures to track and restrict the end use of their products, allowing them to be resold through gray markets and ultimately used in sanctioned Russian military equipment.
The legal complaints further accuse the chipmakers of prioritizing profits over human lives by continuing to use high-risk distribution channels and not strengthening controls, even after public reporting and government warnings about diversion risks. The lawsuits cite specific incidents where US-made components were found in weapons responsible for civilian deaths, including a missile attack on a children's hospital. The outcome of these lawsuits could pressure US tech firms to tighten their supply chain controls and compliance with export regulations to prevent further diversion of sensitive technology to sanctioned entities.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
5 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Following reporting on the cases, Intel reiterated that it had suspended shipments to Russia and Belarus and said it expects partners to uphold the same sanctions standards. No new statements were reported from AMD or Texas Instruments.
Dozens of Ukrainian civilians filed lawsuits in Texas against Intel, AMD, Texas Instruments, and a Berkshire Hathaway-owned company, alleging negligence in preventing their chips from reaching sanctioned Russian and Iranian weapons programs. The suits seek damages and stricter supply-chain controls, arguing the companies relied on inadequate self-certification and ignored warnings about diversion risks.
A Russian missile strike in July 2024 hit Ukraine's largest children's hospital, becoming one of the attacks cited in the lawsuits. Plaintiffs allege US-made chips in Russian weapons contributed to deadly civilian harm.
From 2023 onward, investigators and cited evidence found components from Intel, AMD, Texas Instruments, and other US firms in Russian and Iranian drones and missiles used in the war. The findings became a core basis for claims that export controls and diversion prevention were failing.
After Russia's invasion of Ukraine and related sanctions, Intel said it quickly suspended shipments to Russia and Belarus and required partners to follow the same standards. The lawsuits argue these steps were insufficient to stop diversion through third parties.
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
tomshardware.com
Open sourcearstechnica.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
China’s semiconductor and AI supply-chain posture is shifting under tightening geopolitics and export controls. Reporting cited by *Tom’s Hardware* said China aims to raise domestic **7nm/5nm-class** output from under ~20,000 wafer starts per month to roughly **100,000** within 1–2 years, with a longer-term target of adding **500,000** more monthly wafer starts by 2030; **SMIC** was described as the only China-based firm currently capable of 7nm-class production, expanding advanced-node capacity across multiple fabs despite restrictions on leading-edge tooling. Separately, a U.S. Commerce official told a House hearing that the department had **not approved any sales of Nvidia’s H200 to China** nearly three months after the White House signaled a policy shift, as Washington focuses on enforcement against AI GPU smuggling; the same reporting said Beijing convened major tech firms to gauge demand and later told them to pause H200 purchases while deliberating import policy and domestic substitution. China is also increasing internal enforcement against technology leakage and trade-secret theft, according to *The Record*, with prosecutors reporting more than **1,200** business secret infringement cases handled from 2021–2024 and highlighting a prosecution involving **14 individuals** accused of illegally obtaining advanced chip technology developed by **Huawei HiSilicon** via a startup founded by former Huawei engineers. In parallel, *Tom’s Hardware* relayed a *New York Times* investigative report that U.S. intelligence officials privately briefed top tech CEOs that China could be prepared to move on **Taiwan by 2027**, underscoring systemic supply-chain exposure given Taiwan’s outsized role in advanced semiconductor manufacturing and the potential for severe disruption from a blockade or invasion.
Jun 29, 2026
US federal prosecutors have charged multiple individuals in connection with a smuggling operation that illegally exported at least $160 million worth of Nvidia H100 and H200 AI chips to China, circumventing US export controls. The operation, uncovered as part of Operation Gatekeeper, involved falsifying shipping documents and relabeling chip shipments with a fictional brand to evade detection. One Houston business owner, Alan Hao Hsu, pleaded guilty to smuggling and unlawful export activities, with his company, Hao Global, receiving over $50 million in wire transfers from China to fund the scheme. Two additional suspects, based in New York and Ontario, were also apprehended for their roles in facilitating the illegal shipments, which were coordinated with employees from a Hong Kong-based shipping company and a China-based AI tech firm. The smuggling ring's activities occurred against the backdrop of shifting US export policies, with the Trump administration recently relaxing some restrictions on older Nvidia Hopper-architecture chips, such as the H100 and H200, while maintaining strict controls on the latest Blackwell chips. The Department of Justice's crackdown highlights ongoing concerns about the transfer of advanced US AI technology to China, particularly for use in high-performance computing and generative AI applications with potential military implications. The case underscores the challenges of enforcing export controls amid evolving technology and international demand for cutting-edge AI hardware.
Jun 29, 2026
US federal authorities have charged four individuals—Hon Ning Ho, Brian Curtis Raymond, Cham Li, and Jing Chen—with conspiring to illegally export restricted Nvidia AI chips and supercomputers to China. The indictment alleges that the group used shell companies, falsified invoices, and covert shipping routes through Malaysia and Thailand to bypass US export controls, which have been in place since October 2022 to prevent advanced AI hardware from reaching China. Prosecutors claim the operation involved at least four export attempts, two of which succeeded, resulting in the shipment of approximately 400 Nvidia A100 GPUs to China, while two other attempts involving HPE supercomputers with Nvidia H100 accelerators and 50 Nvidia H200 GPUs were disrupted by law enforcement. The US government asserts that these export controls are critical to limiting China's access to advanced AI technology, which could be used for military modernization and surveillance. The indictment highlights the use of a Florida-based sham real estate company, Janford Realtor LLC, as a front for the purchases, and details how the defendants allegedly doctored customs paperwork to facilitate the smuggling. The case is part of a broader crackdown on efforts to circumvent US technology restrictions, as authorities seek to prevent the transfer of high-performance computing hardware to Chinese entities.
Jun 29, 2026