The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in partnership with the National Security Agency (NSA), has released new guidance urging enterprises to verify and actively manage UEFI Secure Boot configurations to defend against persistent bootkit threats. The guidance, published as a Cybersecurity Information Sheet, highlights the risks posed by vulnerabilities such as PKFail, BlackLotus (CVE-2023-24932), and BootHole, which have enabled attackers to bypass Secure Boot protections through misconfigurations, outdated certificates, or the use of test keys. The agencies emphasize that default or neglected Secure Boot settings leave organizations exposed to firmware-level malware that can evade traditional security controls, and recommend routine audits and validation of Secure Boot variables using tools provided by the NSA.
The guidance also addresses operational challenges, noting that many enterprises still rely on outdated 2011 Microsoft certificates or have Secure Boot disabled, making them susceptible to both known and emerging threats. Additional real-world examples, such as the HybridPetya ransomware and the Bombshell UEFI shell, underscore the urgency of moving firmware security to the forefront of enterprise cybersecurity policy. Administrators are advised to confirm Secure Boot enforcement, export and analyze configuration variables, and ensure only trusted certificates and hashes are present, thereby strengthening the root of trust and mitigating supply chain and boot-time attack risks.

See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
1 event from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
In December 2025, CISA and the NSA issued guidance urging enterprises to verify, audit, and manage UEFI Secure Boot configurations to reduce exposure to bootkits and firmware-level persistence. The guidance recommends checking Secure Boot variables, avoiding misconfigurations, using NSA-provided validation tools, and incorporating these checks into enterprise and supply-chain security practices.
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.