Loading story…
President Donald Trump has nominated Army Lt. Gen. Joshua Rudd, currently the deputy chief of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, to serve as the new leader of both U.S. Cyber Command and the National Security Agency. This nomination comes after an extended vacancy in the dual-hat leadership role, which has persisted for over eight months following the abrupt firing of the previous chief and deputy, reportedly influenced by far-right activist Laura Loomer. The administration bypassed other potential candidates, including the current acting chief, before selecting Rudd, who has a background in special operations but limited direct experience in cyberwarfare or intelligence.
The Senate will now consider Rudd's nomination, with oversight from both the Armed Services and Intelligence committees. Lawmakers have indicated that while deep technical expertise in cyber operations is beneficial, it is not strictly required for the leadership position. Rudd's appointment is notable for placing a leader with extensive field and command experience, but not a traditional cyber background, at the helm of the Pentagon’s primary digital warfighting and intelligence organizations. The agencies have been operating without a permanent leader since April, impacting continuity at a critical time for U.S. cyber defense and intelligence operations.
See the actors and campaigns active against you right now.
3 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
President Donald Trump nominated Army Lt. Gen. Joshua Rudd, then deputy chief of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, to head both the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command. The nomination was sent to the Senate for review by the Armed Services and Intelligence committees.
Following the April 2025 firings, the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command remained without a Senate-confirmed leader for more than eight months, with the acting chief filling the role during the vacancy.
In April 2025, Gen. Timothy Haugh was fired from his dual-hat role leading the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command after activist Laura Loomer pushed for his removal. His deputy was also removed, leaving both organizations without permanent leadership.
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
See the adversaries and campaigns active against your sector right now, ranked by what they're exploiting.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Army Lt. Gen. **Joshua Rudd**, President Trump’s nominee to serve as the “dual-hat” leader of the **National Security Agency (NSA)** and **U.S. Cyber Command**, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee and defended his qualifications amid questions about his limited direct background in cyber operations and signals intelligence. Rudd argued he would rely on the organizations’ technical expertise and emphasized that integrating intelligence and cyber capabilities is “indispensable” to military decision-making, citing his leadership roles and current position as deputy commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. Outside experts and former officials characterized Rudd’s Indo-Pacific experience—where operational planning is heavily informed by China-focused intelligence—as potentially beneficial for U.S. cyber posture toward **Beijing**, even if his career has been largely in special operations and joint command roles rather than technical cyber leadership. Commentary highlighted how China-linked activity has targeted civilian infrastructure and telecommunications, including intrusions into telecom “lawful intercept” systems, as context for the strategic environment Rudd would inherit if confirmed, alongside ongoing leadership turbulence at NSA/CYBERCOM due to the prior chief’s departure and subsequent vacancies.
Jun 29, 2026
The U.S. Senate confirmed Army Lt. Gen. **Joshua Rudd** to serve as the dual-hatted director of the **National Security Agency (NSA)** and commander of **U.S. Cyber Command**, ending an almost year-long period without a permanent leader. Rudd was confirmed by a **71–29** vote after the Senate first advanced his nomination via a **68–28** cloture vote, an unusual level of floor action for a role that often proceeds without a recorded vote. Rudd will replace acting leader Lt. Gen. **William Hartman**, who has led both organizations since the April firing of Air Force Gen. **Timothy Haugh** and the NSA’s deputy director—dismissals that far-right activist **Laura Loomer** publicly claimed credit for influencing. Sen. **Ron Wyden (D-OR)** forced the nomination to a floor vote and criticized Rudd’s lack of **signals intelligence** and cyber operations background, also pressing him on limits around using NSA foreign surveillance authorities to collect on U.S. persons without a warrant as Congress approaches a debate on renewing **FISA Section 702** (set to expire next month absent action).
Jun 29, 2026
The U.S. Senate confirmed Gen. **Joshua Rudd** to lead both **U.S. Cyber Command** and the **National Security Agency**, filling a dual-hatted role that had been vacant since Gen. Timothy Haugh was fired and replaced on an acting basis by Lt. Gen. William Hartman. Reporting noted some lawmakers objected to Rudd’s perceived lack of cyber experience, but the confirmation elevates him to general and restores a Senate-confirmed leader to the organizations responsible for national cyber operations and signals intelligence. Separately, the House Energy and Commerce Committee advanced a bipartisan package of **energy cybersecurity** bills aimed at strengthening defenses for U.S. critical infrastructure, particularly smaller electric utilities. The package would extend the Department of Energy’s Rural and Municipal Utility Advanced Cybersecurity program, reorganize and consolidate DOE cyber responsibilities under the Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security and Emergency Response, and add measures to embed cybersecurity into state energy planning, clarify federal roles in oil and gas cybersecurity, and stand up a pilot **Energy Threat Analysis Center** amid concerns about state-backed activity such as **Volt Typhoon** targeting U.S. infrastructure.
Jun 29, 2026