Loading story…
Financial institutions are increasingly adopting regulatory technology (RegTech) to address the growing complexity and speed of financial crime. Recent academic research highlights a shift from manual, after-the-fact compliance controls to real-time, data-driven systems that enhance oversight and risk management. These technologies, including machine learning for customer behavior analysis and blockchain for secure digital identities, are transforming customer due diligence and Know Your Customer (KYC) processes, making compliance more proactive and adaptive to evolving criminal tactics.
Simultaneously, the regulatory landscape for technology, particularly artificial intelligence and open source software, is tightening. The EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and the AI Act are prompting organizations to embed secure development practices and compliance measures throughout their product lifecycles. Companies like Red Hat are implementing comprehensive internal programs to align with new regulations, emphasizing the need for international standards that support both security and innovation. These developments underscore a broader trend: compliance and security are becoming integral to technology development and deployment, not just afterthoughts or checklists.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
4 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Help Net Security summarized the research and reported that banks are under growing pressure as criminals move money across borders more quickly, making traditional compliance methods less effective. The article framed RegTech as an emerging solution for real-time, data-driven financial oversight.
The reviewed research also identified barriers to uniform RegTech adoption, including inconsistent data standards, differing regulatory expectations, and cost and integration challenges for smaller institutions. This showed that the benefits of RegTech were not being distributed evenly across the sector.
Research covered in the review found that machine learning models reduced false positives in transaction monitoring by about 30% and cut manual reviews by 51%, while improving detection of high-risk activity. These findings were presented as evidence of RegTech's operational impact in anti-financial-crime programs.
Academic research published between 2020 and 2024 examined how regulatory technology was being applied to customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, reporting automation, and cross-border information sharing in financial institutions. The body of work described a shift from manual, after-the-fact compliance controls toward more real-time, data-driven oversight.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Regulatory frameworks worldwide are fundamentally transforming how organizations approach cybersecurity, moving from basic compliance checklists to demanding demonstrable accountability and operational resilience. New standards such as the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the U.S. SEC’s enhanced disclosure rules, and the Department of Defense’s Cybersecurity Risk Management Construct (CRMC) are driving organizations to embed security into their core operations, require real-time awareness, and enforce transparent incident reporting. Financial services and critical infrastructure sectors are particularly impacted, with regulations mandating regular crisis management exercises, red-teaming, and cross-functional collaboration to ensure readiness against evolving threats. The complexity of compliance has increased, with organizations now required to simulate sophisticated cyber incidents, document threat scenarios, and provide evidence of secure-by-design principles. While these changes aim to improve resilience and reduce risk, they also introduce operational challenges, such as increased manual effort, higher costs, and the need for automation to streamline processes. Security leaders are urged to adapt to these evolving requirements, focusing on continuous compliance, embedded security, and transparent communication from technical teams to executive leadership.
Jul 12, 2026
Organizations are rapidly integrating AI technologies into their cybersecurity and business operations, but this shift introduces new risks and regulatory complexities. CISOs are urged to assess organizational risk tolerance, vendor viability, and the security implications of AI-powered solutions, as adversaries exploit AI for advanced attacks such as deepfakes, phishing, and prompt injection. The rise of shadow AI—unauthorized or poorly governed AI use—has led to increased breach costs and operational risks, while established vendors and startups alike are embedding AI into security tools for threat detection and incident response. Research indicates that extensive AI deployment can significantly reduce breach recovery times and costs, but also highlights the dangers of unmanaged AI adoption. Simultaneously, compliance is evolving from a procedural hurdle to a strategic enabler in regulated industries, with frameworks like HIPAA, SOC 2, and the EU AI Act shaping how AI and data are managed. CIOs face mounting pressure to establish robust AI and data foundations that ensure sovereignty, regulatory readiness, and operational resilience. Enterprises that act quickly to unify data governance and AI readiness are seeing substantial returns, while those lagging behind risk falling short of compliance and security expectations. The convergence of AI adoption, data sovereignty, and regulatory mandates is redefining digital transformation, making security and compliance central to enterprise innovation strategies.
Jun 29, 2026
European security and compliance teams are facing significant challenges in operationalizing regulatory requirements, particularly in areas such as AI incident response and software supply chain visibility. Reports indicate that while regulatory frameworks like GDPR and upcoming AI regulations are well established on paper, many organizations in France, Germany, and the UK lag behind global averages in adopting AI anomaly detection and training data recovery capabilities. Additionally, the adoption of software bill of materials (SBOM) management and secure software development lifecycle (SDLC) practices remains limited, exposing persistent gaps in supply chain security. The increasing use of generative AI tools, personal cloud services, and unsanctioned applications is compounding these operational challenges, leading to a rise in data policy violations and cloud-based risks. Security teams are advised to enhance monitoring and control over data movement across both managed and unmanaged cloud services, as well as to address persistent threats such as phishing. The evolving landscape underscores the need for European organizations to bridge the gap between regulatory compliance and practical, day-to-day security operations to effectively manage emerging risks.
Jun 29, 2026