Loading story…
Federal actions tied to election integrity and voter-fraud narratives triggered sharp backlash and oversight concerns. In Georgia, federal officials raided Fulton County’s Elections Office and seized roughly 700 boxes of 2020-election records, including physical ballots, prompting state and local election officials to warn about ballot chain-of-custody risks and the precedent such a raid could set ahead of the 2026 midterms. Lawmakers also criticized the administration for pursuing what they described as baseless online conspiracy theories, while the administration described plans to repurpose the federal SAVE database—historically used for tracking immigrant benefits—into a voter citizenship verification tool.
Separately, bipartisan leaders of the Senate Finance Committee demanded details from the Social Security Administration (SSA) after a court filing indicated the agency does not know the full extent of SSA data accessed and shared by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The filing alleged DOGE associates circumvented SSA data-sharing procedures, used unauthorized third-party servers to share data, and that SSA still cannot determine what data was shared or whether it remains on those servers; it also described an agreement to share SSA data with an unnamed political advocacy group seeking evidence of voter fraud and to overturn results in certain states. SSA reportedly made Hatch Act referrals related to the incident and acknowledged learning key details only during a later, unrelated review.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
10 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
After many states refused to provide sensitive voter registration data, including protected personally identifiable information, the Department of Justice sued 29 states and the District of Columbia to compel disclosure. The reference says six states later had the cases dismissed and one state settled and provided the requested data.
A ProPublica-reported chain of events said White House election official Kurt Olsen pushed the FBI to seize 2020 election materials in Georgia. The effort reportedly later advanced under new leadership, providing new context for the federal seizure of Fulton County election records.
Under the Trump administration, election-security capabilities across DOJ, DHS, CISA, the NSC, and the FBI were reduced, repurposed, or dismantled, while at least 75 career officials involved in election protection left, were fired, or were reassigned. ProPublica reported that roughly two dozen Trump-installed appointees were placed in roles that could influence election oversight and investigations.
Senate Democrats requested briefings from Attorney General Pam Bondi and other officials over the Fulton County election office seizure and broader federal efforts to obtain voter data. They cited concerns about how collected voter data is stored, protected, accessed, and used.
Senators Michael Crapo and Ron Wyden requested a comprehensive briefing from SSA after the Jan. 16 court filing raised questions about DOGE's access to and sharing of SSA data. The request expanded congressional oversight of the matter.
A Jan. 16 court filing disclosed that SSA does not know the full extent of data accessed and shared by DOGE and described alleged procedural bypasses and unauthorized sharing. The filing became a key trigger for expanded congressional and legal scrutiny.
Federal officials conducted a raid on Fulton County, Georgia's Elections Office and seized about 700 boxes of 2020-election-related records, including physical ballots. The action drew criticism from lawmakers and state election officials, while the search warrant remained sealed.
A password-protected file containing SSA data was emailed to former DOGE operational head Steve Davis. SSA believed the file may have included the names and addresses of about 1,000 people.
Last spring, DOGE associates allegedly bypassed SSA data-sharing procedures and used unauthorized third-party servers to share SSA data. SSA later said it could not determine the full extent of what data was accessed or whether it remained on those servers.
In March 2025, a DOGE employee signed an agreement to share Social Security Administration data with an unnamed political advocacy group seeking evidence of voter fraud and to overturn results in certain states. The disclosure later prompted SSA to make two Hatch Act referrals to the Office of Special Counsel.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
5 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
statescoop.com
Open sourcetechdirt.com
Open sourcepropublica.org
Open sourcecyberscoop.com
Open sourcenextgov.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Court filings in ongoing litigation over the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to Social Security Administration (SSA) data describe a March 2025 outreach from a political advocacy group seeking help analyzing state voter rolls it had obtained, with the stated goal of finding voter fraud and overturning election results in certain states. According to a Justice Department correction signed by civil division official Elizabeth Shapiro, two DOGE associates at SSA were contacted, and one signed and sent a “Voter Data Agreement” that was not processed through SSA’s normal data-exchange approval procedures; SSA later discovered the agreement during an unrelated internal review. The filings say SSA has not seen evidence that SSA data were actually shared with the advocacy group, but communications suggest DOGE team members could have been asked to access SSA data to match against voter rolls, potentially involving Social Security numbers and use of unapproved third-party infrastructure. SSA made referrals to the Office of Special Counsel for potential **Hatch Act** violations tied to the alleged political activity, while the broader dispute over DOGE’s access to SSA data continues and has prompted corrections to prior SSA testimony in court.
Jun 29, 2026
The Trump administration has expanded federal involvement in election administration through a White House order on citizenship verification and new Homeland Security grant conditions that tie **$1 billion** in counterterrorism funding to election-related requirements. FEMA said states must move away from barcode- and QR-code-based voting systems, perform manual audits on at least **5%** of ballots after every federal election, reconcile voter participation with ballots cast, and use the `SAVE` system to verify citizenship in voter rolls and for some election workers. DHS said the measures are intended to counter foreign interference, insider threats and cyberattacks, while state and local groups argued the policy redirects homeland security funds into contested election policy. At the same time, state election officials say federal pressure has intensified through DOJ warning letters sent to all 50 states about voter rolls and noncitizen voting, the firing of Election Assistance Commission commissioners, and a reduction in election-security support previously provided by agencies such as CISA. ProPublica also reported that the FBI explored using AI to compare signatures on tens of thousands of seized mail-ballot envelopes from Fulton County, Georgia, with voter registration records as part of a renewed 2020 election investigation, despite expert warnings that large-scale signature matching is unreliable and can wrongly reject legitimate ballots. Officials in several states told CyberScoop they now view the federal government itself as a source of operational and legal risk, prompting them to build informal information-sharing networks and strengthen legal preparedness.
Jul 15, 2026
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a federal agency reportedly created by Elon Musk, has come under intense scrutiny for its handling of sensitive personal data belonging to millions of Americans. According to a report by the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Democrats, DOGE has been bypassing established cybersecurity protections at three major federal agencies: the Social Security Administration (SSA), the General Services Administration (GSA), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The committee's findings are based on staff visits, whistleblower disclosures, legal filings, and media reports, all of which point to significant lapses in data security and privacy compliance by DOGE personnel. One particularly alarming incident involved DOGE uploading the Numident database—a file containing highly sensitive personal information—into an environment lacking additional safeguards, which an internal SSA risk review estimated carried a 35% to 65% chance of a data breach with catastrophic consequences. Whistleblowers further alleged that DOGE staff, including Edward Coristine, had the ability to move sensitive SSA data into unmonitored cloud environments, raising the risk of unauthorized access or exfiltration. The Senate report also highlighted that DOGE teams were sometimes denied access to agency offices due to security concerns, and that DOGE personnel had not completed the same cybersecurity training required of other federal employees. In response to these findings, the committee urged federal agencies to revoke DOGE's access to sensitive information until the department demonstrates compliance with privacy laws and cybersecurity best practices. The report has sparked widespread concern about the potential for large-scale data breaches and the misuse of Americans' personal information. The situation is further complicated by the broader context of increasing government surveillance and the aggregation of disparate data streams, as noted by security experts. The risks posed by DOGE's practices are seen as distinct from those of corporate surveillance, with the potential for government misuse of personal data being particularly acute in a techno-authoritarian environment. The revelations have prompted calls for greater oversight, transparency, and accountability in how federal agencies and their contractors handle sensitive data. Lawmakers and privacy advocates are demanding immediate action to mitigate the risks and prevent future incidents. The controversy underscores the critical importance of robust cybersecurity protocols and strict adherence to privacy regulations in all government operations involving personal data. The ongoing investigation and public debate are likely to shape future policy and enforcement actions regarding federal data security. The case also serves as a cautionary tale for other agencies and private sector partners about the dangers of circumventing established cybersecurity safeguards. As the story develops, the focus remains on ensuring that Americans' personal information is protected from both internal and external threats. The incident has also reignited discussions about the balance between efficiency, innovation, and security in government technology initiatives. Ultimately, the DOGE controversy highlights the urgent need for comprehensive reforms to safeguard the privacy and security of citizens' data in the digital age.
Jun 29, 2026