Loading story…
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published its 2025 AI use case inventory, showing law enforcement operations as the agency’s most common application of AI. Of 238 AI use cases listed across DHS, 86 were categorized as law enforcement, with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) accounting for a majority of DHS’s reported AI deployments (CBP 83, ICE 51). DHS also reported that 35 law-enforcement AI use cases were designated “high impact” under Office of Management and Budget (OMB) criteria, meaning outputs can materially affect rights or safety; examples cited include anomaly detection, smartphone forensics triage, open-source/social media analysis, and biometrics-driven capabilities such as facial recognition.
Within the inventory, ICE disclosed an “AI Enhanced ICE Tip Processing” capability used to sort, translate, and summarize public tip submissions to help investigators prioritize urgent cases and reduce manual review. Reporting indicates the service uses Palantir generative AI tooling to produce a “BLUF” (bottom-line-up-front) summary using one or more commercially available large language models; DHS stated the models were trained on public-domain data by providers and were not additionally trained on agency data, though they do process tip submissions during operation. The inventory lists the tool as becoming operational on May 2, 2025, and notes it was not present in the prior year’s inventory.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
4 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
DHS published its 2025 AI use case inventory, showing 238 deployed AI use cases, with law enforcement as the largest category. The inventory also showed ICE’s AI use cases nearly doubled from 2024 and documented the new ICE tip-processing system.
DHS’s 2025 AI Use Case Inventory lists ICE’s 'AI Enhanced ICE Tip Processing' capability as operational as of May 2, 2025. The Palantir-supported system uses generative AI to sort, translate, summarize, and prioritize public tips for investigators.
A DHS Office of Inspector General report said the department was delinquent in mandatory AI reporting and had initially omitted 66 use cases, including ICE’s facial recognition system. The report criticized DHS’s AI governance practices.
DHS expanded its AI adoption by launching an internal generative AI chatbot. The rollout was cited as part of the department’s broader increase in AI use across components.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
A Lawfare report said the Department of Homeland Security and its immigration agencies have deployed a broad set of AI systems for enforcement and adjudication with limited public visibility and uneven governance. Citing FOIA records, the report said ICE operated about 42 internal AI tools as of May 2024 while only 23 appeared in DHS’s public AI Use Case Inventory, and that CBP operated roughly 75 AI systems, 62 of them active. The systems identified include ICE’s **ImmigrationOS** and **Hurricane Score**, as well as USCIS’s **Asylum Text Analytics**, which are used to prioritize enforcement targets, estimate absconding risk, and flag asylum applications for additional scrutiny. The report said required safeguards such as privacy impact assessments, testing, and meaningful human review were often delayed or inadequate, including USCIS’s national rollout of Asylum Text Analytics before approval of a required Privacy Impact Assessment. It also described ICE contracts for AI-assisted skip tracing and plans for large-scale social media surveillance, warning that the technology enables enforcement at a scale that can outpace human review and raises civil-liberties concerns. DHS’s public AI inventory provides an official baseline for disclosed systems, but the gap between that inventory and FOIA-derived records intensified concerns over transparency, oversight, and the expansion of executive AI powers in immigration enforcement.
Aug 5, 2026
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a federal request for information seeking **commercial “Big Data and Ad Tech”** products—explicitly including *ad-tech compliant and location data services*—to “directly support investigative activities,” signaling continued interest in leveraging commercial data-broker and advertising-technology ecosystems for law-enforcement use. Related reporting highlights longstanding concerns that US agencies can sidestep Fourth Amendment warrant requirements by purchasing sensitive data about residents, and notes broader DHS/ICE enforcement activity that has increased scrutiny of surveillance practices and the downstream impacts of ad-tech tracking on affected communities. Separately, the UK Home Office’s Border Security Command is pursuing up to **£100M** in procurement for a “maritime situational awareness system” designed to autonomously detect, track, and identify small boats and other non-cooperative vessels, including fusing data from land-based and **BVLOS drones** into a managed “Coastal Maritime ISR Service.” In parallel, a viral “ICE List” site claimed to publish leaked personal data on thousands of DHS employees, but analysis found the database largely relies on **publicly available self-disclosed information** (notably LinkedIn), underscoring operational security risks from personnel oversharing even when no breach is involved.
Jun 29, 2026
Organizations are rapidly expanding the use of **AI agents**—systems that can execute multi-step tasks with limited human supervision—while governance, safety, and oversight controls lag behind. Deloitte’s *State of AI in the Enterprise* survey of 3,200+ business leaders across 24 countries reported **23%** of companies already using AI agents “at least moderately,” projected to rise to **74%** within two years, while only about **21%** said they have robust safety and oversight mechanisms in place. Separately, commentary warning about AI-enabled intrusion acceleration cited a purported “**GTG-1002**” campaign in which AI agents allegedly automated most of the intrusion lifecycle and compressed response windows, arguing that traditional SOC processes struggle against autonomous, high-velocity adversary tradecraft. Multiple other items in the set focus on broader *responsible AI* and policy concerns rather than a single security incident: an interview-style piece describes how “responsible AI” functions inside a large vendor’s product process, and another report highlights expert concerns about deploying LLM tools in **law enforcement** workflows (e.g., summarizing body camera transcripts or generating crime scene photo descriptions) given risks like hallucinations and bias. A separate business-leadership article frames cybersecurity and AI as strategic imperatives amid geopolitical instability but does not provide incident-specific or vulnerability-specific details. Overall, the material is best characterized as **governance and risk posture** coverage around agentic AI rather than a unified, verifiable breach or vulnerability disclosure.
Jun 29, 2026