Loading story…
A nonprofit, the Fulu Foundation, launched a bounty aimed at weakening Amazon Ring’s dependence on cloud services by rewarding a method to run Ring camera systems locally and prevent video from being transmitted to Amazon’s servers. The program offers $10,000 up front and will match community donations up to an additional $10,000, but it is explicitly not a general vulnerability bounty; it prioritizes a practical path to local control and data sovereignty, citing Ring’s prior privacy lapses and an FTC settlement as justification.
Separately, public anger over surveillance has escalated into physical attacks on Flock Safety license-plate reader (LPR) cameras, with reports of devices being dismantled, smashed, spray-painted, or cut down in multiple U.S. states. The backlash is tied to concerns that LPR data supports immigration enforcement and deportations; while Flock says it does not share data with ICE directly, reporting indicates local police sharing access to Flock systems and databases with federal authorities, prompting some communities to push for contract terminations and others to resort to vandalism.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
2 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Reports described ongoing destruction and vandalism of Flock license plate reader cameras across the United States amid anger over their perceived role in immigration enforcement and deportations. The coverage also noted that local police customers have shared Flock system access with federal authorities, despite Flock saying it does not directly share data with ICE.
The nonprofit Fulu Foundation announced a $10,000 bounty, with up to another $10,000 in matching community donations, for a method to run Amazon Ring cameras locally without sending data to Amazon’s servers. The effort was framed as both a technical challenge and advocacy around device ownership, privacy, and DMCA anti-circumvention rules.
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
3 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
fsf.org
Open sourcego.theregister.com
Open sourcetechcrunch.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Amazon-owned **Ring** canceled its partnership with **Flock**, a surveillance technology company, after intensified public criticism of Ring’s expanding neighborhood-monitoring capabilities. Commentary highlighted the move as an indicator of how reputationally “toxic” Flock has become in the surveillance ecosystem, and the episode renewed broader concerns about consumer camera products being used to support law-enforcement and mass-surveillance workflows. The backlash was catalyzed by Ring’s *Search Party* feature, promoted in a Super Bowl ad as a way to use a network of Ring cameras to help find lost dogs; reporting citing a leaked internal Ring email indicated the capability could extend to locating other animals and **people**, prompting accusations of a “neighborhood surveillance dragnet.” In parallel, the **Fulu Foundation** (linked to right-to-repair advocate Louis Rossmann) announced a **$10,000 bounty** for techniques that can modify Ring cameras to stop sharing data with Amazon, as some users publicly destroyed devices and Ring CEO **Jamie Siminoff** conducted public damage control following the criticism.
Jun 29, 2026
New York advocacy groups allege that state and local police searched **Flock Safety** automated license-plate-reader (ALPR) data for ICE and CBP-related purposes, sometimes logging the requests under generic investigative labels. Separately, reporting has identified dozens of U.S. officers accused, investigated, fired, or arrested for unauthorized ALPR searches, including alleged personal surveillance of romantic partners. The allegations have renewed calls for stricter audit reviews, access controls, retention limits, and restrictions on sharing vehicle-location data with immigration authorities. Scrutiny also extends to the scale of Flock’s network and the wider ALPR market. Flock reportedly explored using Nexar dashcams in rideshare and delivery vehicles to expand law-enforcement-accessible plate collection, though the company said the partnership did not materialize. Flock has reduced default retention from 30 days to one week and added safeguards, but agencies may be able to change those settings. Municipalities are reconsidering deployments: Manchester, Vermont, tabled a decision on its five cameras amid privacy and AI false-positive concerns, while other cities have disabled systems and opposition has included alleged camera vandalism. Civil-liberties advocates warn that alternative providers, including Motorola Solutions/Vigilant and Axon, create comparable mass-surveillance risks.
Sep 4, 2026
Amazon’s Ring announced a new partnership with Flock Safety, a company known for its AI-powered surveillance cameras and extensive law enforcement clientele, including federal agencies such as ICE, the Secret Service, and the Navy. This collaboration will enable approximately 5,000 local law enforcement agencies to request access to footage from Ring cameras through Flock’s surveillance platforms, FlockOS and Flock Nova. Law enforcement officers will be able to send direct posts in the Ring Neighbors app, specifying the location, timeframe, investigation code, and details of the incident for which footage is being sought. Ring users can review these requests anonymously and voluntarily submit their footage, which Flock will securely package and deliver to the requesting agency. Flock’s technology is notable for its ability to scan license plates and other vehicle identifiers, as well as perform natural language searches to find individuals matching specific descriptions in video footage. The partnership raises significant privacy concerns, as Flock’s AI-powered systems have been criticized for exacerbating racial biases in law enforcement operations. The integration of Ring’s vast network of consumer cameras with Flock’s law enforcement tools could potentially provide authorities with access to millions of additional video feeds. This development has reignited longstanding debates about surveillance, privacy, and the potential for abuse, especially given Ring’s previous issues with video security and employee access. In 2023, the FTC fined Ring $5.8 million after it was revealed that employees and contractors had unrestricted access to customer videos for years. The partnership is positioned as a tool for evidence collection and investigative work, but critics warn that it could further erode the privacy of individuals whose homes and neighborhoods are monitored by Ring devices. The collaboration also highlights the growing trend of private surveillance technology companies working closely with law enforcement, blurring the lines between public safety and personal privacy. Flock’s announcement emphasizes that all footage sharing remains voluntary, but the scale and ease of law enforcement requests may pressure users to comply. The partnership is expected to streamline investigative processes for police, but it also amplifies concerns about the normalization of mass surveillance in residential areas. Privacy advocates are calling for greater transparency and oversight regarding how footage is requested, shared, and used by authorities. The move underscores the increasing reliance of law enforcement on private-sector surveillance infrastructure, raising questions about accountability and the protection of civil liberties.
Jun 29, 2026