Loading story…
Zero trust was the common topic across the relevant coverage, focusing on how identity, device health, and contextual access controls can reduce the impact of compromised credentials, infected endpoints, and third-party access. One report used practical scenarios such as stolen VPN credentials, a compromised employee laptop, and contractor connectivity to show how ZTNA can limit lateral movement compared with traditional VPN-based access.
A second relevant article argued that zero trust is harder to implement effectively in IoT and OT environments, where legacy systems, operational constraints, and device limitations can undermine standard identity- and policy-based controls. The material is not fluff because it contains substantive security analysis, but one reference is not actually about the same topic and appears to be a different opinion piece mixed into the page metadata rather than coverage of zero trust itself.
Get the actors, campaigns, and ATT&CK mapping behind it.
2 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Help Net Security publishes a video featuring Zenarmor CEO Murat Balaban explaining zero trust and zero trust network access through scenarios such as stolen VPN credentials, a compromised laptop, and contractor access. The piece frames ZTNA as a way to reduce lateral movement and limit blast radius using identity, device health, and contextual checks.
A CSO Online roundup identifies a lead news item stating that overly permissive "guest" settings may be putting Salesforce customers at risk. No further incident details, victims, or remediation timeline are provided in the reference.
Get the adversaries, campaigns, and ATT&CK mapping behind this technique, with detections ready to deploy.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
A new CISSP Executive Briefing Series highlights Zero Trust as a security operating model, emphasizing continuous verification and least privilege access. The approach aligns with CISSP domains and addresses evolving threats, regulatory requirements, and business agility. Leadership is advised to treat Zero Trust as an enterprise-wide strategy, focusing on governance, identity management, and continuous monitoring.
Jun 29, 2026
Organizations continue to face significant obstacles in fully implementing zero trust security models, despite more than 15 years since the concept's introduction. Key barriers include legacy infrastructure, fragmented identity and access management tools, and organizational resistance to changing established security paradigms. Experts highlight that misconceptions about zero trust—such as its perceived operational complexity and high costs—further slow adoption, with many enterprises struggling to move beyond traditional 'castle and moat' approaches. The rise of artificial intelligence is also complicating the landscape, requiring a fundamental rethink of technology and security strategies. As critical infrastructure like smart grids modernize and decentralize, the attack surface expands dramatically, introducing new threat vectors that challenge existing security frameworks. Millions of distributed devices, such as solar inverters and EV chargers, now serve as potential entry points for attackers, and vulnerabilities in firmware or supply chains can be exploited to compromise entire networks. Security leaders emphasize the need for end-to-end security architectures that address risks from edge devices to the cloud, underscoring the urgency for utilities and enterprises alike to rethink resilience, trust, and defensive strategies in the face of evolving threats.
Jun 29, 2026
Cybersecurity experts are emphasizing the growing importance of Zero Trust principles and robust identity security as attackers increasingly leverage AI-powered techniques, such as social engineering and deepfakes, to gain unauthorized access. Discussions highlight that attackers are now more likely to "log in" using stolen credentials rather than "break in" through technical exploits, making traditional perimeter defenses less effective. The rise of AI is also eroding critical thinking and increasing the risk of falling for sophisticated scams, underscoring the need for continuous verification, least-privilege access, and a culture of vigilance within organizations. Zero Trust architecture, which operates on the principles of "never trust, always verify" and "assume breach," is now seen as more essential than ever in countering these evolving threats. Security leaders are urged to focus on identity security, minimize standing privileges, and address the risks posed by shadow AI and misinformation. The consensus is that while AI introduces new challenges, it also reinforces the necessity of foundational security practices to protect digital environments against increasingly advanced adversaries.
Jun 29, 2026