Loading story…
Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard received the A. M. Turing Award for foundational contributions to quantum information science, particularly work that reshaped secure communication and computing. Both reports highlight the importance of the BB84 protocol, which demonstrated that cryptographic keys could be exchanged using quantum mechanics in a way that reveals interception attempts, establishing a new model for secure communications beyond classical mathematical assumptions.
The coverage also emphasizes that their research helped create the broader field of quantum information, extending beyond cryptography into concepts such as quantum teleportation and the long-term development of a quantum internet. Nature notes that this is the first Turing Award recognizing work tied to quantum physics, while ZDNet frames the award in the context of growing concern that future quantum computers could undermine current encryption and increase pressure on organizations to prepare quantum-ready security strategies.
Track how attackers are adapting to this technology.
5 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
The 2025 A. M. Turing Award was awarded to Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard for foundational contributions to quantum information science. The award recognized four decades of work that transformed secure communication, computing, and the broader field of quantum information.
In 1996, their research contributed to entanglement distillation, a technique for improving the quality of shared entangled states over noisy channels. This became an important building block for reliable long-distance quantum communication.
In 1993, Bennett and Brassard's broader quantum information work helped establish quantum teleportation as a formal protocol for transferring quantum states using entanglement and classical communication. The work became a major milestone in the development of quantum networking.
In 1984, Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard introduced the first practical concept for exchanging encryption keys using quantum mechanics. Their protocol showed that communicating parties could detect eavesdropping because interception disturbs the quantum states being transmitted.
After the original BB84 proposal, Bennett later led an IBM team that experimentally demonstrated the quantum encryption key exchange approach. The experiment helped validate that the concept could work beyond theory, though the article does not specify the exact date.
Follow how adversaries are adapting to this technology, and where it touches your stack today.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
IBM, the University of Chicago, and several partners published three preprint papers describing quantum-computing experiments on **IBM Heron** processors that aim to show computations beyond leading classical simulation methods while improving confidence in the correctness of the results. The most prominent paper introduced **doped Clifford sampling**, combining Clifford circuits, spacetime-code error detection, and injected `T` gates to create a classically hard computation with a built-in fidelity certificate; the team reported a 70-qubit circuit encoded across 97 physical qubits and a fidelity lower bound of **0.284** with **95% confidence**. Two additional studies, including work involving **Qedma**, **RIKEN**, **BlueQubit**, and **Algorithmiq**, reported quantum simulation results that remained stable after tested classical methods stopped converging or produced inconsistent outputs, using techniques such as embedded error checks, postselection, error mitigation, repeat runs, and cross-platform comparisons with trapped-ion systems. The papers have not been peer reviewed, do not rule out future classical algorithmic advances, and have not demonstrated commercial utility, but they are being presented as a significant step toward more credible and verifiable claims of quantum advantage.
Aug 2, 2026
U.S. federal experts told a House Science, Space and Technology Committee hearing that **quantum technology commercialization** will require tighter coordination between government labs and industry, with agencies like **NIST** positioned to co-develop capabilities that private companies can productize. Testimony emphasized that while the application landscape remains early, progress is moving beyond the “noisy intermediate-scale quantum” era, citing **demonstrations of quantum error correction** as a sign of maturation and noting expectations that **fault-tolerant quantum computing** could emerge around 2030. Separately, quantum-software firm **BlueQubit** announced a public “Quantum Advantage Challenge” offering a **0.25 BTC (~$22.5K) prize** to anyone who can recover a private key/hidden bitstring embedded in a **quantum-optimized** search problem. BlueQubit claims its approach can identify a hidden bitstring in a `2^56` search space in under two hours, while asserting classical supercomputers would take years; the challenge is framed as a verifiable demonstration of **quantum advantage** applied to a cryptography-adjacent task, amid broader industry skepticism about prior “quantum advantage/supremacy” claims.
Jun 29, 2026
DARPA’s **Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (QBI)** has drawn scrutiny after reports that **Microsoft** and **PsiQuantum** reached **Stage C** through the earlier **US2QC** program, a pathway aimed at evaluating underexplored architectures with a plausible route to utility-scale quantum computing by 2033. The Stage C designation reflects a **verification-and-validation phase**, not proof that either company’s hardware is technically superior to rivals such as IBM, Quantinuum, or QuEra, which are advancing through different and in some cases more publicly demonstrated development tracks. Public evidence for the two Stage C contenders remains limited and contested. PsiQuantum has disclosed component-level photonic benchmarks but no public logical-qubit demonstration, while Microsoft’s topological-qubit effort continues to face scientific debate over whether the underlying topological states have been convincingly established; a recent **Nature** paper on the robustness of topological gap detection underscores the technical difficulty of validating such signals. Together, the references indicate that DARPA is testing whether these less-proven architectures merit deeper evaluation, rather than confirming that they already work or lead the field.
Aug 3, 2026