Loading story…
Colorado Attorney General Philip Weiser said he will not enforce the Colorado AI Act when it takes effect on June 30 after xAI sued the state in federal court to block the law. Weiser joined xAI and the U.S. Department of Justice in asking the court to pause the case while the statute is reevaluated, signaling that the state’s first-in-the-nation framework for regulating high-risk AI systems will not be implemented on schedule.
Enacted in 2024, the law covers AI used in areas including hiring, lending, housing, insurance, and government services, and has drawn opposition from technology companies that argue it would hinder innovation and impose heavy compliance costs. Civil rights advocates warned that delaying enforcement leaves residents exposed to harms from opaque algorithmic decision-making, while Governor Jared Polis has backed a delay and convened a working group that drafted substantial revisions for consideration during the 2026 legislative session, underscoring the wider fight over state versus federal AI regulation.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
6 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
After xAI's lawsuit, Colorado Attorney General Philip Weiser said he would not enforce the Colorado AI Act when it takes effect. He also joined xAI and the U.S. Department of Justice in asking the federal court to pause the case while the law is reevaluated during the 2026 legislative session.
In early April 2026, xAI filed suit against the state of Colorado seeking to block enforcement of the Colorado AI Act before its scheduled June 30 effective date.
Before April 2026, Governor Jared Polis supported delaying enforcement of the Colorado AI Act and created a working group to develop revisions. The group later produced a draft framework proposing substantial changes to the law.
Colorado legislators voted to postpone enforcement of the Colorado AI Act by five months, moving implementation to the end of June of the following year. The delay followed criticism from industry and other stakeholders who said the law was vague and could impose burdens on low-risk AI systems.
Governor Jared Polis called a special legislative session for Aug. 21, 2025, urging lawmakers to clarify the Colorado AI Act and delay its implementation. He said the law needed clearer definitions and lower compliance burdens, with discussion of pushing implementation to 2027.
Colorado enacted the Colorado AI Act in 2024, creating what the article describes as the first broad state law regulating high-risk AI systems in areas such as hiring, lending, housing, insurance, and government services.
Vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware, products, organizations, and breaches Mallory has linked to this story.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
4 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
statescoop.com
Open sourcestatescoop.com
Open sourcestatescoop.com
Open sourcestatescoop.com
Open sourceMap indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Sen. **Marsha Blackburn** released a discussion draft of the nearly 300-page **"Trump America AI Act"**, proposing a federal framework for artificial intelligence that would impose a **duty of care** on AI developers, create new online platform obligations, and sunset protections for hosts of user-generated content. The draft is positioned as a national standard to replace the current patchwork of state AI rules and aligns with President Trump's call for federal legislation and opposition to state-by-state regulation. In parallel, **Colorado** moved toward revising its 2024 AI law after a state working group published a new policy framework intended to resolve disputes between consumer advocates and the technology industry. The proposal would clarify disclosure requirements for high-stakes AI uses such as hiring, housing, and lending, require developers to provide information on data sources and system limitations, and shift liability so responsibility is assigned according to each party's role rather than placed on a single actor. Together, the developments show AI regulation accelerating on two separate tracks: a broad federal legislative push and a state effort to narrow and refine an existing law.
Jun 29, 2026
A bipartisan discussion draft in the House, the **Great American Artificial Intelligence Act of 2026**, would create the first broad U.S. federal framework for regulating frontier AI developers such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and Meta. The proposal would require large model developers to publish safety and governance frameworks, issue transparency and incident reports, assess catastrophic risks, and undergo semiannual independent audits or verification. The bill defines catastrophic risks to include mass-casualty harms, major property damage, cyberattacks, CBRN weapon assistance, and loss-of-control scenarios, while also formalizing the **Center for AI Standards and Innovation** and funding it at **$100 million annually** from fiscal 2027 through 2029. The draft would also block states for **three years** from specifically regulating AI model development, a provision that drew immediate criticism from opponents who say it could suppress stronger state protections even as it preserves generally applicable state laws and post-deployment oversight. Beyond model governance, the measure would extend the **Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act** through 2035, direct DHS to support small and rural critical infrastructure operators, fund open-source software maintainers using frontier models for vulnerability discovery and patching, and establish AI testbeds across federal labs and private partners to evaluate threats including autonomous offensive cyber capabilities and risks to critical infrastructure.
Jun 29, 2026
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey urged strong federal AI oversight and clear safety standards after President Donald Trump dismissed AI-safety concerns and argued that constraints could hand China an advantage. Congressional action on frontier-AI safety appears unlikely before the midterm elections: Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson favor industry self-regulation, while unresolved disputes include mandatory risk frameworks, independent testing, shutdown mechanisms, development pauses, federal preemption of state laws, and the scope of oversight for model developers. Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Greg Cezar introduced the **Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act**, which would pause specified advanced-AI development, establish a cabinet-level enforcement agency, and impose penalties of up to 20 years' imprisonment for violations. The push follows calls for restraint from leaders at Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and xAI amid concerns over loss of control, misuse in bioweapons research, and intense competitive pressure; proponents argue that durable controls would require both a U.S. regulatory framework and international coordination, particularly with China.
Sep 17, 2026