Loading story…
Major Australian banks are leveraging AI-powered bots from Apate.ai to impersonate potential scam victims, gather real-time intelligence, and disrupt scam operations. These bots operate across voice, text, and social media platforms, feeding actionable data into fraud detection systems used by banks, telecoms, and government agencies. The system adapts to evolving scam tactics, helping to keep the bots undetected and effective.
Mallory correlates global threat intelligence with your attack surface — know if you’re exposed before adversaries strike.
1 event from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
Initial story creation
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Researchers from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, the University of Melbourne, and Ben Gurion University of the Negev found that generative AI chatbots can outperform human scammers during the trust-building stage of pig-butchering fraud. In a week-long simulation with 22 participants, **46 percent** complied with an AI chatbot's request to download an app, compared with **18 percent** who complied with a human scammer's request to download a game, and participants also assigned higher trust scores to the AI. The researchers said large language models could automate the earliest and longest phase of romance-investment scams, with a human operator stepping in only at the final stage to direct victims to fraudulent investment platforms and avoid model safeguards. The study was informed by interviews with **145 former scam workers**, including trafficking survivors from scam compounds in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos, who described criminal use of AI for translation, language polishing, persona development, and video deepfakes. Researchers also found that some leading LLMs could be prompted to impersonate humans and at times conceal that they were AI, raising concerns that scam networks could scale operations while becoming less dependent on visible scam compounds in Southeast Asia and harder for defenders and victims to detect.
Aug 1, 2026
Financial services organizations are facing a surge in sophisticated fraud attempts enabled by artificial intelligence, as threat actors leverage AI tools to automate and scale their attacks. Recent reports highlight that AI is being used to craft highly convincing phishing emails and social engineering campaigns, making it increasingly difficult for traditional security measures to detect malicious activity. Attackers are utilizing generative AI to personalize messages, mimic legitimate communications, and evade standard email filters, thereby increasing the success rate of phishing attempts. In response, financial institutions are adopting advanced AI-powered security solutions designed to identify and block these next-generation threats. These defensive tools analyze behavioral patterns, detect anomalies, and adapt to evolving attack techniques, providing a dynamic shield against AI-driven fraud. The deployment of agentic AI systems allows organizations to automate threat detection and response, reducing the window of opportunity for attackers. Security teams are also leveraging machine learning to monitor transaction patterns and flag suspicious activities in real time, helping to prevent unauthorized transfers and account takeovers. The integration of AI into both offensive and defensive cyber operations marks a significant escalation in the financial fraud landscape. Experts warn that as AI technology becomes more accessible, the volume and complexity of attacks will continue to rise, necessitating ongoing investment in AI-based defenses. Training and awareness programs are being updated to educate employees about the risks posed by AI-generated phishing and social engineering. Regulatory bodies are also beginning to issue guidance on the ethical use of AI in financial services, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability. Collaboration between industry stakeholders is increasing, with information sharing initiatives aimed at identifying emerging AI-driven threats. The rapid evolution of AI capabilities underscores the importance of proactive security strategies and continuous monitoring. Financial organizations are urged to assess their current defenses and consider the adoption of agentic AI tools to stay ahead of adversaries. The convergence of AI in both attack and defense highlights a new era in cybersecurity, where automation and intelligence are central to both risk and resilience. As the threat landscape evolves, the ability to rapidly detect and respond to AI-enabled fraud will be a key differentiator for secure financial operations.
Jun 29, 2026
AI is accelerating and scaling social engineering by automating reconnaissance, targeting, and victim engagement, reducing both the cost and skill required to run convincing phishing and fraud campaigns. One reported evolution is the use of **AI agents** to collect open-source intelligence and conduct live, interactive conversations with targets with minimal or no human involvement, enabling high-volume, continuously running scam operations that can adapt in real time. Deepfake-enabled impersonation is further eroding trust in voice and video communications, including calls and meetings, with examples cited of finance staff being deceived into transferring **millions** after interacting with fabricated “executives.” Recommended mitigations emphasize shifting from human-sense validation to process-based controls—e.g., enforced verification procedures, out-of-band checks, shared authentication phrases (“safe words”), and emerging *content provenance* approaches—because traditional, predictable detection models are increasingly strained by the speed, personalization, and adaptability of AI-driven attacks.
Jun 29, 2026