Skip to main content
Mallory
MalwareRansomwareUsed by 10 actorsExploits 4 CVEs

REvil

Also known asSodinSodinokibi

REvil, also known as Sodin and Sodinokibi, is a Russia-based ransomware family and ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation described as a successor to GandCrab. It is associated with Russian-speaking cybercrime activity and long-term affiliates, and reporting cited in the content notes links to Russia-based actors. REvil is known for financially motivated double-extortion operations in which it encrypts victim systems and exfiltrates data for additional leverage via leak-site publication or auction.

The malware has been distributed via malicious email attachments, including Microsoft Word documents, and has also been deployed following exploitation of internet-facing vulnerabilities and remote management software. The content specifically links REvil/Sodinokibi activity to exploitation of Pulse Connect Secure vulnerability CVE-2019-11510 and to the July 2021 Kaseya VSA supply-chain attack, which used zero-day vulnerabilities including CVE-2021-30116 and CVE-2021-30120 to bypass authentication and deploy ransomware to downstream customer networks. Another cited intrusion identified ConnectWise Control as the root point of compromise.

Behaviorally, REvil can exfiltrate host and malware information to command-and-control servers and uses encrypted C2 communications with the ECIES algorithm. It has used PowerShell to download files and delete volume shadow copies, and can also use vssadmin to delete shadow copies and bcdedit to disable recovery features. The malware can use WMI to monitor for and kill specific processes listed in its configuration, can connect to and disable a Symantec server on a victim network, and can query the Registry to obtain random file extensions to append to encrypted files. It also performs locale-based self-exclusion by checking system language via GetUserDefaultUILanguage and GetSystemDefaultUILanguage and terminating if the language matches an exclusion list. Reporting also notes use of reflective DLL loading techniques in Sodinokibi campaigns.

REvil has been tied in the content to multiple high-profile incidents and victims, including the Kaseya VSA attack affecting fewer than 60 direct customers and more than 1,500 downstream businesses, the compromise of Quanta Computer, attacks against Acer, and the intrusion into entertainment law firm Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks. In the Kaseya incident, REvil demanded up to $70 million in Bitcoin for a universal decryptor, with other demands including $5 million from MSPs and $44,999 from individual businesses. The content also states that REvil set ransom demands as high as $42 million in the GSMLaw incident and threatened staged publication of 756GB of stolen data. Industries and sectors explicitly referenced include managed service providers, technology manufacturing, entertainment/media, and broader enterprise victims worldwide.

The content further notes that REvil infrastructure disappeared after July 2021 amid pressure from law enforcement and the White House, later briefly reappeared, and that U.S. authorities charged Yaroslav Vasinskyi in connection with deploying Sodinokibi/REvil, including the Kaseya attack. High-confidence aliases from the content are REvil, Sodin, and Sodinokibi.

Share:
For your environment

Hunt this family in your stack

Mallory pivots from this family to the IOCs, detections, and named campaigns that touch your stack, and pages you when something new lands.

EXPLOITED CVES

Vulnerabilities exploited

4 CVEs Mallory has correlated with this family across public research and vendor advisories. Each row links to the full Mallory page for that vulnerability.

4 CVES
CVE-2019-11510Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure Arbitrary File Read VulnerabilityExploited in the wild

Previously, Pulse Connect Secure has been targeted by a variety of threat actors including ransomware groups and other nation-state aligned threat actors over the last five years: CVE-2019-11510 Ivanti Pulse Connect Secure Arbitrary File Read Vulnerability. | We’ve also published several blog posts about vulnerabilities in Pulse Connect Secure: ... CVE-2019-11510: Critical Pulse Connect Secure Vulnerability Used in Sodinokibi Ransomware Attacks

via tenable blogtenable.com
CVE-2021-301202FA Bypass in Kaseya VSA <9.5.7Exploited in the wild

The 2021 Kaseya VSA compromise by REvil used several zero-day vulnerabilities, including CVE-2021-30116 and CVE-2021-30120, which allowed them to bypass authentication requirements to access VSA servers en route to deploying ransomware in up to 1500 downstream client networks. | In early 2021, Quanta Computer, a Taiwanese technology manufacturer and Apple partner, was compromised by the REvil ransomware group... The 2021 Kaseya VSA compromise by REvil used several zero-day vulnerabilities, including CVE-2021-30116 and CVE-2021-30120, which allowed them to bypass authentication requirements to access VSA servers en route to deploying ransomware in up to 1500 downstream client networks.

via ca ccscyber.gc.ca
CVE-2021-30116Kaseya VSA dl.asp Credential Disclosure and Authentication BypassExploited in the wild

In early 2021, Quanta Computer, a Taiwanese technology manufacturer and Apple partner, was compromised by the REvil ransomware group... The 2021 Kaseya VSA compromise by REvil used several zero-day vulnerabilities, including CVE-2021-30116 and CVE-2021-30120, which allowed them to bypass authentication requirements to access VSA servers en route to deploying ransomware in up to 1500 downstream client networks. | The 2021 Kaseya VSA compromise by REvil used several zero-day vulnerabilities, including CVE-2021-30116 and CVE-2021-30120, which allowed them to bypass authentication requirements to access VSA servers en route to deploying ransomware in up to 1500 downstream client networks.

via ca ccscyber.gc.ca
CVE-2021-26855ProxyLogon SSRF in Microsoft Exchange Server

Computer giant Acer has been hit by a REvil ransomware attack where the threat actors are demanding the largest known ransom to date, $50,000,000.

via bleeping computerbleepingcomputer.com
THREAT ACTORS

Groups observed using it

10 distinct threat actors attributed by public researchers. Open in Mallory to see the full evidence chain and overlapping campaigns.

View more details
Velvet Tempest

In 2020 ELBRUS transitioned from using PoS malware to deploying ransomware as part of a financially motivated extortion scheme, specifically deploying the MAZE and Revil RaaS families.

via microsoft generalmicrosoft.com
Indrik Spider

One group known for pivoting is Evil Corp., the gang behind Revil. Revil’s tactics align with why a threat group would target an insurance provider.

via cybersecurity divecybersecuritydive.com
FIN7

In 2020 ELBRUS transitioned from using PoS malware to deploying ransomware as part of a financially motivated extortion scheme, specifically deploying the MAZE and Revil RaaS families.

via microsoft generalmicrosoft.com
DEV-0216

In 2020 ELBRUS transitioned from using PoS malware to deploying ransomware as part of a financially motivated extortion scheme, specifically deploying the MAZE and Revil RaaS families.

via microsoft generalmicrosoft.com
UNC2628

UNC2628 is thought to partner with other RaaS services including REvil and Netwalker.

via zdnet zero dayzdnet.com
Lockean

Between June 2020 and March 2021, Lockean attacked at least seven more companies with various ransomware families: Maze, Egregor, ProLock, REvil.

via bleeping computerbleepingcomputer.com
OnePercent

Between June 2020 and March 2021, Lockean attacked at least seven more companies with various ransomware families: Maze, Egregor, ProLock, REvil.

via bleeping computerbleepingcomputer.com
GOLD SOUTHFIELD

GOLD SOUTHFIELD has used the cloud-based remote management and monitoring tool "ConnectWise Control" to deploy REvil.

via mitre attack websiteattack.mitre.org
REvil group

"REvil, also known as Sodinokibi, emerged in 2019 and is widely believed to have evolved out of the GandCrab ransomware group."

via blackfogblackfog.com
REvil

Computer giant Acer has been hit by a REvil ransomware attack where the threat actors are demanding the largest known ransom to date, $50,000,000.

via bleeping computerbleepingcomputer.com
MITRE ATT&CK

Techniques & procedures

31 distinct techniques documented for this family, organized by ATT&CK tactic.

T1588.001MalwareEvidence1

The U.S. and German government’s action today addresses the abuse of virtual currency to launder ransom payments.

Initial Access

2 techniques
T1078Valid AccountsEvidence1

Tetra was able to confirm that the “Tech Support” account, and all its administrative-level privileges, was compromised. This single user gave the threat actor full access to the network.

T1566.001Spearphishing AttachmentEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware being delivered through phishing or spearphishing emails containing malicious attachments such as Microsoft Office documents, PDFs, RAR/ZIP archives, CHM, ISO, IMG, HTA, LNK, and executable files disguised as documents.

Execution

6 techniques
T1047Windows Management InstrumentationEvidence1
TacticExecution

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware using WMI/WMIC/wmiexec for remote execution, lateral movement, discovery, persistence, and administrative actions; e.g., 'APT41 used WMI in several ways, including for execution of commands via WMIEXEC as well as for persistence via PowerSploit' and 'Scattered Spider used Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) to move laterally via Impacket.'

T1053Scheduled Task/JobEvidence1

Once the code was in place, a task named “RanCommand” was performed, effectively starting the Sodinokibi encryption process across the network.

T1059Command and Scripting InterpreterEvidence1
TacticExecution

Overall, attackers can use LoLBins to: Download and install malicious code Executing malicious code... These campaigns can be relatively easily detected by internal hunting teams by analyzing command lines and their options.

T1059.001PowerShellEvidence3
TacticExecution

Its logs revealed that a base64 encoded Windows PowerShell script command was staged, submitted, and completed by the threat actor.

T1059.003Windows Command ShellEvidence2
TacticExecution

During the 2016 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, Sandworm Team used the xp_cmdshell command in MS-SQL. During the 2025 Poland Wiper Attacks, the adversaries leveraged PsExec to run cmd.exe commands on multiple victim machines. Numerous malware families and groups are described as using cmd.exe, cmd /c, Windows command shell, or command-line interfaces to execute commands, payloads, reconnaissance, persistence, cleanup, and ransomware actions.

T1204User ExecutionEvidence1
TacticExecution

The content repeatedly describes victims being lured into opening malicious attachments, enabling macros, launching installers, clicking embedded files/links, or otherwise directly executing malicious content.

Persistence

3 techniques
T1053Scheduled Task/JobEvidence1

Once the code was in place, a task named “RanCommand” was performed, effectively starting the Sodinokibi encryption process across the network.

T1078Valid AccountsEvidence1

Tetra was able to confirm that the “Tech Support” account, and all its administrative-level privileges, was compromised. This single user gave the threat actor full access to the network.

T1112Modify RegistryEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware modifying, creating, deleting, or storing data in Windows Registry keys and values for persistence, configuration storage, defense evasion, credential access, privilege escalation, and execution. | Many malware families store configuration, payloads, encryption keys, C2 addresses, or other operational data in Registry keys, such as QakBot storing configuration in a randomly named subkey under HKCU\Software\Microsoft and PolyglotDuke writing encrypted JSON configuration files to the Registry.

T1053Scheduled Task/JobEvidence1

Once the code was in place, a task named “RanCommand” was performed, effectively starting the Sodinokibi encryption process across the network.

T1078Valid AccountsEvidence1

Tetra was able to confirm that the “Tech Support” account, and all its administrative-level privileges, was compromised. This single user gave the threat actor full access to the network.

Stealth

8 techniques
T1027Obfuscated Files or InformationEvidence2
TacticStealth

The Invoke-Obfuscation module is often used to create polymorphic obfuscated variants... The downloaded code is a reflective DLL loader with randomized function names to avoid simple pattern-based detection engines... This cryptocurrency miner had five deobfuscation stages.

T1027.013Encrypted/Encoded FileEvidence1
TacticStealth

Examples throughout the content include 'encrypted payloads decrypted and executed in memory,' 'encrypts its configuration file,' 'AES-encrypted resource,' 'RC4 encrypted embedded scripts,' and 'payload includes an encrypted main component.'

T1036MasqueradingEvidence1
TacticStealth

During the 2016 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, DLLs and EXEs with filenames associated with common electric power sector protocols were used to masquerade files.

T1070.004File DeletionEvidence4
TacticStealth

"Akira will execute PowerShell commands to delete system volume shadow copies" and "REvil has used PowerShell to delete volume shadow copies."

T1078Valid AccountsEvidence1

Tetra was able to confirm that the “Tech Support” account, and all its administrative-level privileges, was compromised. This single user gave the threat actor full access to the network.

T1140Deobfuscate/Decode Files or InformationEvidence1
TacticStealth

The content repeatedly describes malware and threat actors decoding, decrypting, or deobfuscating payloads, strings, configuration data, commands, and C2 traffic prior to execution or use, e.g., 'APT28 macro uses the command certutil -decode to decode contents of a .txt file storing the base64 encoded payload' and 'Action RAT can use Base64 to decode actor-controlled C2 server communications.'

T1218System Binary Proxy ExecutionEvidence1
TacticStealth

One popular technique we're seeing at this time is the use of living-off-the-land binaries — or "LoLBins"... LoLBins are used by different actors combined with fileless malware and legitimate cloud services to improve chances of staying undetected within an organisation, usually during post-exploitation attack phases.

T1620Reflective Code LoadingEvidence1
TacticStealth

Popular malware like Sodinokibi and Gandcrab have used reflect DLL loaders in the past that allows attackers to load a dynamic library into process memory without using Windows API... the obfuscated Cobalt Strike beacon... gets deobfuscated with a static XOR key and loaded into memory using reflective loading techniques.

T1112Modify RegistryEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware modifying, creating, deleting, or storing data in Windows Registry keys and values for persistence, configuration storage, defense evasion, credential access, privilege escalation, and execution. | Many malware families store configuration, payloads, encryption keys, C2 addresses, or other operational data in Registry keys, such as QakBot storing configuration in a randomly named subkey under HKCU\Software\Microsoft and PolyglotDuke writing encrypted JSON configuration files to the Registry.

Discovery

4 techniques
T1012Query RegistryEvidence1
TacticDiscovery

The content repeatedly describes malware and threat actors querying, enumerating, searching, reading, or checking Windows Registry keys and values, e.g., "ADVSTORESHELL can enumerate registry keys," "APT41 queried registry values to determine items such as configured RDP ports and network configurations," and "Reg may be used to gather details from the Windows Registry of a local or remote system at the command-line interface."

T1033System Owner/User DiscoveryEvidence1
TacticDiscovery

"InvisibleFerret has also queried the victim device using Python scripts to obtain the User and Hostname" and "Pikabot performs a variety of system checks and gathers system information, including commands such as whoami."

T1082System Information DiscoveryEvidence1
TacticDiscovery

The content repeatedly describes malware and threat actors collecting host details such as OS version, hostname, architecture, CPU, memory, BIOS, domain, language, and other configuration data; e.g., "APT41 uses multiple built-in commands such as systeminfo and net config Workstation to enumerate victim system basic configuration information."

T1614.001System Language DiscoveryEvidence2
TacticDiscovery

Avaddon checks for specific keyboard layouts and OS languages to avoid targeting Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) entities... Bazar can perform a check to ensure that the operating system's keyboard and language settings are not set to Russian... Clop has checked the keyboard language using the GetKeyboardLayout() function... Ryuk has been observed to query the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Nls\Language and the value InstallLanguage.

Lateral Movement

1 technique
T1021Remote ServicesEvidence1

They confirmed the ransomware variant as Sodinokibi/REvil, and the root point of compromise to be from a cloud-based RMM (Remote Management and Monitoring) solution named “ConnectWise Control.”

Collection

1 technique
T1119Automated CollectionEvidence1

In ScreenConnect, when extended logging is enabled, all screenshare sessions are recorded, so anytime someone (authorized or not) remotes into a computer using the software, user activity is captured.

T1071.001Web ProtocolsEvidence2

The content repeatedly describes threat actors, malware, and campaigns using HTTP and/or HTTPS for command and control, including examples such as BlackEnergy communicating with C2 over HTTP POST requests and many other families using HTTP/S for C2.

T1105Ingress Tool TransferEvidence1

Overall, attackers can use LoLBins to: Download and install malicious code... The usage of LoLBins has been frequently combined with legitimate cloud services such as GitHub, Pastebin, Amazon S3 storage and cloud drives such as Dropbox, Box and Google Drive.

T1573Encrypted ChannelEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes malware and threat actors using SSL, TLS, HTTPS, RSA, AES, Blowfish, RC4, ECIES, Diffie-Hellman, OpenSSL, WolfSSL, and mutual TLS to protect command and control traffic.

Exfiltration

1 technique
T1041Exfiltration Over C2 ChannelEvidence2

ADVSTORESHELL exfiltrates data over the same channel used for C2... Agrius exfiltrated staged data using tools such as Putty and WinSCP, communicating with command and control servers... numerous malware and groups sent victim data, files, credentials, or host information over existing C2 channels.

Impact

3 techniques
T1486Data Encrypted for ImpactEvidence7
TacticImpact

The second stage of the script actually executed the Sodinokibi ransomware, encrypted targeted files on the system, and rendered them inaccessible.

T1490Inhibit System RecoveryEvidence3
TacticImpact

The script also removed Windows Volume Shadow Copies — this prevents restoring the device.

T1657Financial TheftEvidence2
TacticImpact

He and his co-conspirators demanded ransom payments in cryptocurrency and used exchangers and mixing services to hide the money. | If targeted organizations refused to pay, the attackers “threatened to publicly disclose victims’ data.”

Other

1 technique
T1562Impair DefensesEvidence1

The content repeatedly describes threat actors and malware disabling, stopping, uninstalling, or modifying antivirus, EDR, Windows Defender, AMSI, logging, and other security controls.

INDICATORS OF COMPROMISE

IOCs tracked for this family

4 indicators attributed across vendor reports, sandbox runs, and researcher write-ups. Full values are available in Mallory.

View more in app
Network
1 tracked

IPs, domains, and DNS infrastructure linked to this family.

Hashes
3 tracked

File hashes (MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256) from samples and reports.

TypeValueLatest sighting
domain●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app7 years ago
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app7 years ago
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app7 years ago
hash.sha256●●●●●●●●●●●●View more in app7 years ago
What this page doesn’t show

The version that knows your environment.

This page is what’s public. Mallory adds the parts that aren’t: which of your assets match these IOCs, which detections are missing, which campaigns to expect next, and what to do in the next 30 minutes.
IOC matching4

Match every observed IP, domain, and hash against your live telemetry.

Threat actor attribution10

Named campaigns wielding this family, with evidence pinned to each claim.

Exploited vulnerabilities4

CVEs this family uses for access and lateral movement.

Detection signatures

YARA, Sigma, Snort, and vendor rules, auto-deployed to your SIEM.

MITRE ATT&CK mapping31

Every documented technique, ranked by evidence weight.

Researcher chatter

Reddit, Mastodon, and CTI community discussion around this family.