Loading story…
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated three major consultations to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto asset activities and markets, aiming for full implementation by 2027. The proposed regulations will bring crypto assets, including stablecoins and qualifying digital assets, under oversight similar to that of traditional financial services, with a focus on consumer protection and market integrity.
Key elements of the FCA's proposals include subjecting crypto trading platforms, intermediaries, staking providers, and decentralized finance (DeFi) firms to new conduct, disclosure, and prudential rules. The framework also introduces a standalone market abuse regime, stricter admission and disclosure requirements, and enhanced prudential standards to mitigate risks associated with weak financial reserves and potential firm failures. Legal experts have characterized this regulatory initiative as a significant milestone for the U.K. crypto sector.
See the reporting duties and controls this puts on the clock.
5 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority outlined and opened consultations on a plan to fully regulate crypto assets and related activities by 2027, aiming to align oversight with traditional financial services.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission moved to obtain long-term bans against former FTX and Alameda Research executives following the collapse of the firms.
A senior promoter of the iComTech Ponzi scheme was sentenced in the United States to nearly six years in prison for his role in the fraud operation.
U.S. authorities indicted a Brooklyn man accused of running a phishing operation that stole about $16 million from Coinbase users, marking a significant law enforcement action tied to crypto-enabled fraud.
A cryptocurrency trader was defrauded of $50 million in USDT through an address poisoning scam, highlighting the continued effectiveness of wallet-manipulation tactics against high-value targets.
See what this changes for your reporting obligations and which controls it puts on the clock.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
The **U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission**, working with the **CFTC**, issued interpretive guidance that for the first time lays out a formal taxonomy for crypto assets and states that **most crypto assets are not themselves securities**. The guidance creates four categories that fall outside federal securities laws—**digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and payment stablecoins**—while reserving securities treatment for **digital securities**, defined as tokenized versions of traditional instruments such as stocks and bonds. The interpretation also clarifies how the **Howey test** applies when a crypto asset is part of an investment contract, marking a significant shift from the prior SEC approach under Gary Gensler, which had been criticized for relying on enforcement rather than clear rulemaking. The new framework was presented as an interim regulatory step while Congress continues work on broader market-structure legislation, including the **CLARITY Act**, and reflects the more coordinated posture between the SEC and CFTC under Chairman **Paul Atkins**. Supporters said the guidance is intended to reduce legal uncertainty for issuers, exchanges, and investors, and to return the SEC to policing actual securities transactions rather than treating broad swaths of the crypto market as securities by default. One reference is an opinion piece advocating for the same policy change and reinforcing the agency's rationale, while the other cited articles concern separate issues—including U.K. political donations, an Iran-linked exchange, allegations involving Binance, and Senate negotiations on crypto legislation—and are not part of this specific regulatory action.
Jul 12, 2026
Regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrency have evolved rapidly in 2025, with significant changes such as the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation coming into full effect. Despite these advancements, implementation has been inconsistent across regions, with national interpretations and technical challenges complicating compliance for organizations operating internationally. Similar regulatory developments have occurred in Singapore and other jurisdictions, highlighting the global trend toward more comprehensive oversight of digital assets. Security leaders, particularly CISOs at multinational organizations, face increasing frustration with the fragmented nature of global crypto regulations. The lack of harmonization means that while cyber threats such as ransomware and advanced persistent threats operate without regard for borders, security teams must navigate a patchwork of compliance requirements. This regulatory complexity diverts resources from actual threat mitigation to compliance management, underscoring the urgent need for more unified global standards in cryptocurrency regulation and security.
Jun 29, 2026
Governments are increasing pressure on the cryptocurrency ecosystem through **sanctions enforcement** and **stricter compliance obligations** aimed at disrupting money laundering, ransomware payments, and terrorism financing. OFAC has progressively expanded sanctions designations to include **cryptocurrency addresses** and, in some cases, entire crypto services, reflecting the view that virtual assets are being used to evade traditional financial controls; this approach has been supported by published guidance for the virtual currency industry on how to mitigate sanctions risk and avoid facilitating crypto-enabled crime. India has similarly tightened its anti–financial crime posture by updating rules for cryptocurrency service providers via **FIU-IND** guidelines that require registration for any crypto entity serving Indian residents, including offshore operators. The new requirements mandate enhanced KYC and ongoing monitoring—collecting identity documents and financial details, plus technical and geolocation data (e.g., IP addresses and latitude/longitude with timestamps) and selfie-based verification—along with continuous transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting for both fiat and virtual currency flows, aligning crypto compliance expectations more closely with those applied to traditional financial institutions.
Jul 1, 2026