Loading story…
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, working with the CFTC, issued interpretive guidance that for the first time lays out a formal taxonomy for crypto assets and states that most crypto assets are not themselves securities. The guidance creates four categories that fall outside federal securities laws—digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and payment stablecoins—while reserving securities treatment for digital securities, defined as tokenized versions of traditional instruments such as stocks and bonds. The interpretation also clarifies how the Howey test applies when a crypto asset is part of an investment contract, marking a significant shift from the prior SEC approach under Gary Gensler, which had been criticized for relying on enforcement rather than clear rulemaking.
The new framework was presented as an interim regulatory step while Congress continues work on broader market-structure legislation, including the CLARITY Act, and reflects the more coordinated posture between the SEC and CFTC under Chairman Paul Atkins. Supporters said the guidance is intended to reduce legal uncertainty for issuers, exchanges, and investors, and to return the SEC to policing actual securities transactions rather than treating broad swaths of the crypto market as securities by default. One reference is an opinion piece advocating for the same policy change and reinforcing the agency's rationale, while the other cited articles concern separate issues—including U.K. political donations, an Iran-linked exchange, allegations involving Binance, and Senate negotiations on crypto legislation—and are not part of this specific regulatory action.
Track how attackers are adapting to this technology.
2 events from the most recent confirmed update back to the earliest known activity.
In the same guidance, the SEC said an investment contract tied to a digital asset may no longer be a security once the issuer's promised efforts are completed or fail to materialize. The interpretation also addressed how the Howey test applies to token sales, airdrops, mining, staking, and wrapped non-security crypto assets.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly released interpretive guidance defining categories of crypto assets and clarifying how federal securities laws apply to them. The taxonomy states that most crypto assets are not securities, while digital securities remain subject to securities regulation.
Follow how adversaries are adapting to this technology, and where it touches your stack today.
2 references tracked. Mallory keeps watching after this page renders.
Map indicators from this story to your assets and identify affected systems in minutes.
Every observed campaign, victim, and pivot linked to actors named in this story.
Malware, exploits, and IOCs connected to the activity described here.
YARA, Sigma, and Snort rules deployed to your SIEM as soon as they’re published.
Get matching new stories delivered to your team as they break — not the next morning.
Ask questions about this story and take action on the answers.
Other stories Mallory is tracking that overlap on entities, sources, or topic labels.
Senate negotiations on the **Digital Asset Market Clarity Act** moved closer to a committee hearing as Republican lawmakers, industry stakeholders, and the White House worked through final compromises on crypto market-structure legislation. The central dispute has focused on **stablecoin yield and rewards programs**, with lawmakers seeking language that would prevent crypto platforms from using terminology that resembles bank deposit products while still preserving a path forward for the bill. Senator **Cynthia Lummis** said negotiators believe they have the needed compromises to move the measure out of the Senate Banking Committee, potentially in April, though additional issues such as the treatment of **decentralized finance** still require agreement. The bill remains a top policy priority for the crypto industry, but its path depends on resolving objections from community bankers, securing support from previously uncertain senators, and maintaining bipartisan backing through later Senate stages. Reporting indicates that updated legislative text was expected to be shared with the White House, while lawmakers also discussed possible side concessions tied to other legislation to win support. Even with progress on the stablecoin-yield debate, the measure still faces procedural and political hurdles before it could reach the full Senate and ultimately the president's desk.
Jun 29, 2026
The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated three major consultations to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto asset activities and markets, aiming for full implementation by 2027. The proposed regulations will bring crypto assets, including stablecoins and qualifying digital assets, under oversight similar to that of traditional financial services, with a focus on consumer protection and market integrity. Key elements of the FCA's proposals include subjecting crypto trading platforms, intermediaries, staking providers, and decentralized finance (DeFi) firms to new conduct, disclosure, and prudential rules. The framework also introduces a standalone market abuse regime, stricter admission and disclosure requirements, and enhanced prudential standards to mitigate risks associated with weak financial reserves and potential firm failures. Legal experts have characterized this regulatory initiative as a significant milestone for the U.K. crypto sector.
Jun 29, 2026
Regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrency have evolved rapidly in 2025, with significant changes such as the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation coming into full effect. Despite these advancements, implementation has been inconsistent across regions, with national interpretations and technical challenges complicating compliance for organizations operating internationally. Similar regulatory developments have occurred in Singapore and other jurisdictions, highlighting the global trend toward more comprehensive oversight of digital assets. Security leaders, particularly CISOs at multinational organizations, face increasing frustration with the fragmented nature of global crypto regulations. The lack of harmonization means that while cyber threats such as ransomware and advanced persistent threats operate without regard for borders, security teams must navigate a patchwork of compliance requirements. This regulatory complexity diverts resources from actual threat mitigation to compliance management, underscoring the urgent need for more unified global standards in cryptocurrency regulation and security.
Jun 29, 2026